Jump to content

Talk:Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Use of the title Brigade Manager

[edit]

Wikipedia generically uses the term or title "Brigade Manager" to describe officers of the fire service whom have obtaied the rank of Cheif Fire Officer or County Fire Officer in the UK Fire Service.

The term or title "Brigade Manager" has not been widely accepted and does not reflect true accuracy. The term Cheif Fire Officer or Firemaster (in Scotland) should instead be used for clarity and to reflect accuracy

Fixed it for you. The template can now be set to use a different job title. --Cheesy Mike (talk) 19:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Combined

[edit]

I did some work combining Somerset with Devon, for which no page existed previously. What I can't find at the moment is the name of the chief fire officer. I have got the full list of stations organised by type and by division/area. Some more photos would be nice - UK Geographs is a nice source of free-to-use images - if anyone is interested in uploading any. I hope my unilateral decision to get rid of the station addresses and postcodes was OK - they just didn't seem to add any value to the article. Some additional info about types of appliances would be nice. --Cheesy Mike 18:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DevonSomersetFireRescue.gif

[edit]

Image:DevonSomersetFireRescue.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale added. --Cheesy Mike 12:04, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers on appliances

[edit]

Why were all the callsign numbers added onto individual appliances? I really don't see the point of list these. Yes a reader might well be interested to learn that Cheddar has two appliances including the 6 wheel drive beastie, but I cannot see why they would be interested in the callsign - just as they wouldn't be interested in the individual vehicles registration numbers. Those callsigns aren't used in the media, they aren't listed on D&S's website and (as they therefore can't be verified) they aren't encyclopaedic. I agree with Sammidon and that's why I have removed them from the article. Let's have some consensus here before listing them again. --TimTay (talk) 21:48, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well I now see that the callsigns can be verified, but I still don't think that they should be included. Furthermore I picked 10 UK fire service articles at random and not one had callsigns lists. In fact only one, Wiltshire, listed anything near the detail that is in this article. I'd never accuse anyone of being a trainspotter, but that's the way this article looks like it is going at the moment. --TimTay (talk) 21:54, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Per the request for opinions at Wikiproject Fire Service, I'd agree that such information is a violation of WP:INDISCRIMINATE and unnecessary. Jclemens (talk) 23:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with TimTay's comments; this is beginning to look messy and untidy. A URL can be placed on the page to direct those who wish to find out such information. Samiddon (talk) 22:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incidents

[edit]

Not sure if it is or isn't encyclopedic...discuss. However, if is to be included I think the detail should be kept to a minimum...rewritten in the authors own words; but using the DSFRS newsdesk as a source. Not sure what value, having three or four incidents, is gained.Squirrel684 (talk) 23:58, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok i will just put one on there i put 4 on their because it is a busy night..Wrcf1 (talk) 00:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think it should have been delete ..Wrcf1 (talk) 21:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
TimTay makes a valid point that the Fire Service deals with thousands of incidents daily. The notable incidents such as the Buncefield oil terminal fire and the Gloucestershire and Oxfordshire floods should be included as they are, generally, unique and would be classed as encyclopedic. I would therefore agree that it probably shouldn't be included.Squirrel684 (talk) 07:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrcf1 (talk • contribs) 13:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Appliances section

[edit]

The whole appliances/equipment section is an unnecessary duplication of Fire apparatus and should be removed. Furthermore it is unreferenced. Comments? --TimTay (talk) 21:15, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a source.Squirrel684 (talk) 21:19, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Urban Search and Rescue station number??

[edit]

What is Urban Search and Rescues number?--Wrcf1 12:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Noticeable Incidents

[edit]

anyone know of any more Noticeable Incidents.--Wrcf1 13:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit]

I just deleted a gallery which was setup on the page. WP:Galleries makes it clear when galleries are suitable. This article already has a large number of images most of which illustrate the text within the article. There is no justification for a gallery. --Simple Bob (talk) 21:39, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emergency Response Unit.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Emergency Response Unit.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Emergency Response Unit.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:57, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:21, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Devon_and_Somerset_Fire_and_Rescue_Service&oldid=1206953434"