Talk:Destruction Derby/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Electroguv (talk · contribs) 13:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• The last two sentences of Reception need inline citations.
  • Done. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:37, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

a (major aspects): b (focused):

• The entire second para of Development is devoted the game's N64 version but there is not a word about the DOS and Saturn versions. Why not write about them, too?
  • The same goes for the PS Network release.
    • Quite simply, it's because there is no information on those versions. The original release and the N64 version were the ones that had development coverage and developer quotes. Why the N64 version? Probably because it was so heavily changed—and because it was released 4 years after the original. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:37, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
      • Actually, I found a tiny bit of coverage for the Saturn version in one of the scans I was provided while working on this article. Let me add that. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:44, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
        • Done. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:58, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:

Pass/Fail:

• I'll pass the article when the issues are fixed. Electroguv (talk) 08:48, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the review. See my comments above. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:37, 15 December 2012 (UTC)