Talk:Delta Cancri
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Arkushanangarushashutu?
[edit]From Star Names: Their Lore and Meaning which is an unreliable source. Citation needed but not Allen. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 12:03, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Delta Cancri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716072234/http://www.astro.illinois.edu/~jkaler/sow/asellusbor.html to http://www.astro.illinois.edu/~jkaler/sow/asellusbor.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Delta Cancri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100811014924/http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/Research/StarName/c_research_chinengstars_ama_b.htm to http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/Research/StarName/c_research_chinengstars_ama_b.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Binarity
[edit]Another problem binary. The WDS entry lists a discovery code of 'TOK 3' for A. A. Tokovinin with an observation date of 1982, but I don't see the star in those referenced papers. The Eggleton and Tokovinin (2008) say it is a single star.[1] Hartkopf and McAlister (1984) do list this as an unresolved binary.[2] I'm not sure how to resolve this, so I'll just leave this as a note. Praemonitus (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- There are two optical companions, or one double optical companion if you want to look at it that way. The suspected binary companion is mentioned in Bibcode:1983SvAL....9..293T, but the observation is described as unreliable. The title of the work is a bit garbled and it has also been listed as Bibcode:1983PAZh....9..559T which I couldn't find. TOK 3 incorrectly indicates part I of the series which doesn't mention this star? Nothing since, which seems to have been taken as meaning it doesn't exist. Lithopsian (talk) 18:36, 18 June 2021 (UTC)