Jump to content

Talk:Dean Castle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeDean Castle was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 31, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
August 17, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former good article nominee

GA review

[edit]

This is virtually a quick-fail based on the lack of sources, but just doing that wouldn't be beneficial to the article so I'm going to "slow-fail" it with some (hopefully helpful) comments:

  • So, most obviously, citations as per WP:CITE are required throughout the article to provide verifiability of the claims made.
  • Adopt en-dash per WP:DASH for year ranges, so 1935–36 instead of 1935-36.
  • 1460's vs 1580s - apostrophe or not? I'd ditch it, but be consistent.
  • Copyedit to remove things like "JamesII".
  • The Castle Today section needs to be written in a couple of merged, larger paragraphs, not a series of single-sentence paragraphs.

If I can help with anything more specific then let me know, but don't be discouraged, just try to get some reliable secondary sources to cite the claims. All the best. The Rambling Man 16:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Ghost Investigation of Dean Castle has been removed from the page a number of times. Considering it ties into part of the article of spirit investigation, I would maintain it's right of place in the article. While I may personally not accept the findings of "ghost hunters" there is place (unlike what was suggested) for it in Wikipedia.

I would therefore recommend it is restated into the article, however if there is further reasons to why it may not be suitable, I would welcome the debate. Franko2nd (talk) 22:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dean Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We are the “Deans” in “ Canada” and I am doing heraldy and searching for my Family Heritage I also have pictures that need dated of the “DEAN’S from Scotland to “Canada/Winnipeg/Saskatchewan/Alberta My 2605:8D80:32F:A271:FC8E:F684:7D3E:360B (talk) 21:57, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]