Talk:Daytime/Archive 1

Untitled

Article merged: See old talk-page here

Daytime in society

There's no information :/ --occono (talk) 17:26, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merger of Day length into Daytime (astronomy)

Both articles are describing essentially the length of daylight on Earth. However, Daytime (astronmy) has the potential for extending to any planet, is more elaborate and has more articles linking to it. In combining both of them there will be more interwiki links, too.

Proposed by : Pierre cb (talk) 15:36, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

I agree. Merge. TeragR | talk 16:51, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Jc3s5h (talk) 15:43, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Over the course of the year, is the amount of daylight at a given latitude equal to the amount of daylight at any other latitude? Mike McGregor (Can) (talk) 17:24, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested moves

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the pages, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 04:17, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Daytime (astronomy) → Daytime
Daytime → Daytime (disambiguation)

– This article covers the primary meaning of the word "daytime", as ought to be obvious. All of the items listed at Daytime (disambiguation) use the word precisely in the sense discussed here. Moreover, the use of the "astronomy" disambiguator seems to have led editors to believe that this topic should be discussed purely from the perspective of astronomy, which has led to a poor article - compare night, which is much better. The article could be at day as well, but that seems slightly ambiguous; just dropping the disambiguator should suffice. 209.211.131.181 (talk) 16:21, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The nominator explains it pretty well. There's a pretty fundamental significance about a period of the day (see also Twilight) that should go without saying. Egsan Bacon (talk) 17:23, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
!! and support. Wow. Also, what a disambiguator! Red Slash 05:21, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support. A clear primary topic if I ever saw one. —Neil P. Quinn (talk) 01:26, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Looking at the page histories, it looks like the disambiguation page predates the creation of the Daytime (astronomy) article. I assume the latter's creator thought it was just easier to create a new article with a disambiguation title. And whatever reason, neither that editor or anybody else has ever addressed making this the primary topic until now. Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:23, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support, clear primary topic in terms of historical importance. bd2412 T 21:19, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 22:28, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.