Talk:Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 09:47, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Detector Shielding

According the LUX wimp detector people at Berkley (see below) the shielding of this detector has proven to be very effective. Isn't this worth a mention on the page?

-- The technology of nested vessels of different kinds of scintillator, surrounded by photomultiplier tubes, was recently put to the test at Daya Bay, which achieved spectacular success in measuring neutrino oscillations even before the experiment’s full array of antineutrino detectors had been deployed. (http://newscenter.lbl.gov/feature-stories/2012/05/23/lux-lz/) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.212.124 (talk) 04:15, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Updated Results, Formatting a Measurement w/ Positive & Negative errors

They put out a new paper in Jan 2014, but the positive error is not the same as the negative error, so I couldn't just use the +- symbol. How do I properly format this in math markup? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timetraveler3.14 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Someone did it using <math>, but for future reference, you do it with {{Val | 0.090 | +0.008 | -0.009}}, which produces 0.090+0.008
−0.009. For non-numerical sub- and superscripts, you can use {{Subsup}}, but that's really designed for mathematical variables; the first argument is set in italic, and the order of later arguments is reversed: subscript comes first: {{Subsup | 0.090 | −0.009 | +0.008}} produces 0.090 +0.008
−0.009 . {{Val}} has the nice advantage that it converts hyphens to minus signs for you. And it takes an optional fourth argument, a unit of measure. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 16:40, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]