Talk:Dawn of Fantasy

This article was nominated for deletion on February 18, 2020. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (13 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 15 July 2008 by reviewer MSGJ (talk · contribs).

The CEO of Reverie Games said that they won't be published by Lighthouse: It's a bit too early for an official announcement, and at this point I can`t confirm if Lighthouse is bankrupt or not - but Dawn of Fantasy will not be published with Lighthouse Interactive anymore - that much I can say with certainty. But no worries - we have already secured another publisher - and you can expect the full announcement and details in April. [1] Tangurena (talk) 13:21, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

Overlong coverage - reads a little too much like an extended press release - relies too heavily on primary sources.

Needs total rewrite eg At his homeland, the player will meet an advisor unit - wrong writing style - shouldn't be using "his" at all. Also a far too conservational style.

Contradiction - claims single player mode cut in November 2009 for potential future release as DLC, then next section "Kingdom Wars Campaign" describes a " exclusively single-player risk-style map "

Clue - entire gameplay section should be three or less paragraphs, exclude extensive detail. "Civilisations" section is not needed - simply stating that three races (named) are playable is enough, with very limited descriptions of differences. Links should be used eg [[Elves in fantasy fiction and games|Elves]]

94.72.232.213 (talk) 11:11, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The big mystery is how and why the original article [2] had it's references removed [3] and was then converted into a advert like mess with blatant copyright infringements [4]

Some dickhead even managed to remove the link to the game's funder, Telefilm Canada which was present from the start http://www.telefilm.gc.ca/en/catalogues/production/dawn-fantasy (sarcasm begins) Fucking Awesome work (sarcasm ends).Imgaril (talk) 13:40, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dawn of Fantasy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]