Talk:David Coombs (lawyer)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 9 March 2014, it was proposed that this article be moved from David Edward Coombs to David Coombs (lawyer). The result of the discussion was moved.

Toning it down?

Not saying that Coombs isn't a heckuva guy, but the praise in the article could probably be toned down a bit. Hammersbach (talk) 16:07, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, tone down a lot.--S. Rich (talk) 06:11, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trimmed some fluff, added some refs. Snori (talk) 13:45, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He is not a trial advocacy professor. He teaches Criminal Law and Evidence now Wikipeediaomg (talk) 20:22, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Project listing?

Should Mr. Coombs even have a BLP? Several reasons support AFD based on notability: 1. Significant cases are limited; 2. His article is COI'd and PUFF'd; 3. He does not have notability in the legal community, e.g., no ABOTA (American Board of Trial Advocates) rating, no NBTA certification, nor a LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell listing. With these factors in mind, I've reduced his Project Law class to stub and removed importance. --S. Rich (talk) 15:52, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reassess to Start class & Low importance. He's Bradly Manning's defense counsel. Removed Project US as overly broad.--S. Rich (talk) 14:17, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Added "find notice" in this Discussion page

Boyd Reimer (talk) 16:51, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 09 March 2014

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to David Coombs (lawyer). Xoloz (talk) 01:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

David Edward Coombs → David E. Coombs – Unnecessary full middle name. 71.59.58.63 (talk) 14:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Just Be Bold and do a Blank and Redirect. – S. Rich (talk) 16:41, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you suggesting a cut and paste move? Those are not allowed, as they break the edit history. bd2412 T 12:44, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Duh – brain freeze. Rather, I endorse BHG's suggestion. – S. Rich (talk) 02:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to David Coombs (lawyer). I checked all the references in the article, except the dead links or those behind a paywall. In all the sources other than his own website etc, he was referred to as plain "David Coombs". That needs disambiguation, so add "(lawyer)". --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:20, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.