Jump to content

Talk:Dark Skies

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

The article needs a more detailed synopsis of the story arc. —Theo (Talk) 18:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The story arc was pretty darn simple. It's like a cross between Forrest Gump and X-Files, in that all the alien happenings are weaved into history. I agree that more detail on the main page would be handy.--Darkprincealain (talk) 23:50, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dark Skies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

latest claims of intelligence connection

[edit]

In recent episodes of the yt channel 'need to know', Bryce Zabel claimed he was contacted by intelligence agents who offered him real-world information, in order to change the storyline and make it more authentic- in order to influence public opinion and trends. Obviously such claims can't be proved per se, but I believe a mention of this is nevertheless worthwhile. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.1.191.123 (talk) 13:01, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't merit inclusion unless the claim got secondary source coverage. --IJBall (contribstalk) 13:09, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]