Jump to content

Talk:Dandadan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Leak

[edit]

It should include how the first 6 episode were leaked by an unknown source. 2601:2C6:8281:E8F0:FE28:C70B:7F26:4F51 (talk) 08:37, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already posted, using the one that Ranma 1/2 anime reboot also leaked online as well. VernardoLau (talk) 20:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

4 million copies of manga

[edit]

PR Times updated copies in circulation for Dandadan Chuck2597 (talk) 06:49, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

English Dub was produced by Netflix

[edit]

English Dub was produced by Netflix as shown in their anime leak in August and they licensed the dub to Hulu and Crunchyroll 2601:19E:4381:1B10:9092:DCEB:8841:351F (talk) 02:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Production

[edit]

Should we move the paragraphs from the manga/anime chapters/episodes lists and have them put in the production instead, just to make it more unified? - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 11:42, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dandadan is primarily a manga so I recommend dividing that from the anime. If lists are becoming too long splitting them would be better Tintor2 (talk) 00:42, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then again I did the same with Heavenly Delusion until having enough content to split the anime from the manga. Tintor2 (talk) 00:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well that's what I meant; currently the production has two sections. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 01:24, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If I'm understanding correctly, you're saying to move the content from the 'Media' subsections, 'Manga' and 'Anime', to the respective subsections of the production section, right? That being the case, I don't think this is necessary. Production sections are usually to address background, inspirations, influences, and everything that has to do with the creation of the series, while the other stuff in 'Media' is usually related to release dates, licensing, and that stuff. It is not mandatory to do so, but it is the standard. Xexerss (talk) 01:39, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccurate use of former and latter.

[edit]

You have stated Momo ( who believes in ghosts) went to visit the site of occult occurances ( the former in the prior sentence of the article) and that Okarun ( who believes in extraterrestrial aliens) went to a site known for extraterrestrial activity ( the latter in the prior sentence) The opposite is true. You meed to switch the case of former and latter. 2600:1010:B331:BE43:955D:52FC:F4E3:F020 (talk) 09:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

English translation of title

[edit]

Does the title have an official/widely recognized English translation? rtrb (talk) 14:36, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding is that it's just Dandadan/Dan Da Dan. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 17:24, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Its a untranslatable word 71.173.64.97 (talk) 10:49, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]