Jump to content

Talk:Damien Broderick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Someone who knows about these things should crosscheck the entry on virtual reality, including my comments in the discussion section. It would be good to have a consistent story on the origin/coinage of the term "virtual reality". It looks to me as if Broderick may well have coined it, though it was popularised with its more usual usage (a "reality" created by use of computers or computerised equipment) by Lanier a few years later. Metamagician3000 05:58, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

All that red is distracting. I suggest that we remove it. If someone wants to create an article on any of those books they are welcome to, but meanwhile the page is almost unreadable. Metamagician3000 05:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note to self: The Last Mortal Generation needs to be added to the list of publications when I've checked its publication date. Metamagician3000 00:12, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was it not Jaron Lanier who coined the term "virtual reality"? http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Jaron_Lanier

[Wix] 22:33, 3 April 2011 (UTC) 

Chandler Award =

[edit]

Maybe add something about Damien winning the Chandler Award in 2010. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Chandler_Award 203.56.94.11 (talk) 08:04, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Damien Broderick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Damien Broderick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Damien Broderick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Generation Time Machine"

[edit]

I can't find any mention of this phrase online apart from in this article and sites that mirror this article. The cited book and page (The Generation Starship in Science Fiction, Simone Caroti, p 201) don't mention time travel at all, here's the entirety of what it says about this novel:

"Only seven generation starship narratives appeared between 1980 and 2000, a substantial drop from the previous era. Moreover, a look at their chronological distribution will quickly reveal an anomaly: the first story, Damien Broderick’s The Dreaming Dragons, was published in 1980, while the second, Thomas Hubschman’s Space Ark, appeared in 1981" (It goes on to discuss other books using this narrative). The only other mentions of the book or author are in the bibliography and index, and there are only two mentions of "time machine" - both referring to H G Wells's work of that name. On the broader subject of generation starships (the main subject of the book), it does of course cite many examples that occurred before 1980.

I'm inclined to think that the coining of this term is both non-notable and unsourced, perhaps added by a fan looking to pad the author's accomplishments. 222.152.197.94 (talk) 06:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of The Spike (Broderick book)

[edit]

The book may well be notable, but it is unsourced and it would be better to have the two lines of content on it in this article to develop enough to sustain an article of its own. BD2412 T 22:26, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]