This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Lusotitan, I feel your rearrangement breaks the flow of anterior -> posterior, proximal -> distal. If this article really were to highlight the claws, they would be moved up one paragraph and the section would be moved to the top. I don't see the necessity of such a middle-ground step. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 15:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
To any general reader the claw would be the most notable thing in that paragraph. Even in general, it's by far the most distinctive thing about the animal, which is probably why it's one of the first things mentioned in the both lead and the abstract of its description paper. Lusotitan 20:15, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
