Jump to content

Talk:Dali Kingdom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Map

[edit]

The name of the Kingdom on the map is wrong: "Nanzhao" instead of "Dali". How revert to the old version of the map (with the right name)? Polybe 17:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed the map shows the Dali kingdom to overtake the Viet , Hmong , Lao .. South east of "Pagan" (a kingdom in what is now the very south west china)

The map of the Nanzhao e kingomd shows Nanzhao north west of Pagan..... I understand some blur as outer fringers are hardly garrisones / policed... no real physical border and the fringes are filled by ethnics who saddle the border.

But moving the entire lot completely to the otherside of different kingdom ? One or the other is wrong. The contradictor map is http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Premongol.png

202.92.33.42 (talk) 03:09, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Rulers, era names, and reign durations

[edit]

Kings of Dali 大理 938-1254 Duan Siping 段思平 938-944


Wende 文德 938-?


Shenwu 神武 ?

Duan Siying 段思英 945


Wenjing 文經 945

Duan Siliang 段思良 946-951


Zhizhi 至治 946-951

Duan Sicong 段思聰 952-968


Mingde 明德 952-?


Guangde 廣德 ?


Shunde 順德 968

Duan Sushun 段素順 969-985


Mingzheng 明政 969-985

Duan Suying 段素英 986-1009


Guangming 廣明 986-1004


Mingying 明應 1005


Mingsheng 明聖 1006 ?


Mingde 明德 1007 ?


Minzhi 明治 1008-1009?

Duan Sulian 段素廉 1010-1022


Mingqi 明啟 1010-1022

Duan Sulong 段素隆 1023-1026


Mingtong 明通 1023-1026

Duan Suzhen 段素真 1027-1041


Zhengzhi 正治 1027-1041

Duan Suxing 段素興 1042-1044


Shengming 聖明 1042-1043 ?


Tianming 天明 1044 ?

Duan Silian 段思廉 1045-1074


Baoan 保安 1045-1052


Zheng'an 正安 1053-1059 ?


Zhengde 正德 ?


Baode 保德 ?

Duan Lianyi 段連義 1075-1080


Shangde 上德 1076


Guang'an 廣安 1077-1080

Duan Shouhui 段壽輝 1081


Shangming 上明 1081

Duan Zhengming 段正明 1082-1094


Baoli 保立 1082-1085 ?


Jian'an 建安 ?


Tianyou 天祐 ?

Usurper Gao Shengtai 高昇泰 1095


Shangzhi 上治 1095

Duan Zhengchun 段正淳 1096-1108


Tianshou 天授 1096


Kaiming 開明 1097-1102


Tianzheng 天正 1103-1104


Wenan 文安 1105-1108

Duan Zhengyan 段正嚴 1109-1147


Rixin 日新 1109


Wenzhi 文治 1110-?


Yongjia 永嘉 ?


Baotian 保天 1129-?


Guangyun 廣運 ?

Duan Zhengxing 段正興 1148-1171


Yongzhen 永貞 1148


Dabao 大寶 1148-1155


Longxing 龍興 ?


Shengming 盛明 ?


Jiande 建德 ?

Duan Zhixing 段智興 1172-1200


Lizhen 利貞 1172-1175


Shengde 盛德 1176-1180


Jiahui 嘉會 1181-1184


Yuanheng 元亨 1185-1195 ?


Anding 安定 ?

Duan Zhilian 段智廉 1201-1204


Fengli 鳳曆 1201-1203


Yuanshou 元壽 1204

Duan Zhixiang 段智祥 1205-1239


Tiankai 天開 1205-1225


Tianfu 天輔 1226-?


Renshou 仁壽 ?

Duan Xiangxing 段祥興 1239-1251


Daolong 道隆 1239-1251

Duan Xingzhi 段興智 1251-1253


Tianding 天定 1251-1253

Nomenclature

[edit]

It may very well be that the English common name is Dali. All the same, we don't say Daming, Daqing, &c. The thing was Great Li. — LlywelynII 04:11, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page 12
http://www.academia.edu/5067244/The_Dali_Stele_and_Sayyed_Ajalll
http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/13394/4/Dali_Stele_Lane_ToganFest_5.pdf
www.gutenberg-e.org/yang/pdf/yang-bibliography.pdf
http://yunnan.chinadaily.com.cn/2011-08/15/content_13112641.htm
Anon, I'm not sure what the links are supposed to prove since I had already noted the common English name was "Dali". On the other hand, it seems I was mistaken since Da Li certainly sounds like a dynastic name but China Knowledge seems to imply the name of the city predated the kingdom and gave it its name, rather than the other way around. — LlywelynII 05:11, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Kings of Dali claimed Han Chinese origin, not Bai

[edit]

The Duan Kings of Dali claimed their ancestors were Han Chinese from Wuwei in Gansu. 武威段氏

[Link spamming commented out below:]
 — LlywelynII 05:11, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mongol rule

[edit]

Rajmaan (talk) 03:38, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[Rajmaan's link spamming commented out below:]
 — LlywelynII 05:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dali Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"enfeoffed"

[edit]

OED has enfeoff as a synonym under the entry for enfief, but no entry for enfeoff. Readers will be more familiar with fief, as in fiefdom, etc. Mathyeti (talk) 22:33, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:50, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Someone please fix this

[edit]

Famed for its high quality marble, Dali (dàlǐ 大理) literally means "marble" in Chinese.

no, 大理石 (Dali stone) is marble. no one removes the word stone when speaking of marble. 119.236.47.178 (talk) 01:29, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]