Talk:Dai (Spring and Autumn period)

China: History Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from Dai (Spring and Autumn period) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 April 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Dai Prefecture and County carried on the name of a "barbarian" kingdom and Qin commandery, despite being in a completely different part of China?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dai County.

Wikipedia

Sources for future article expansion

Li Feng

places Dai at Minquan 民權.

This "source"

Hanyu Da Cidian, 3rd ed., Hong Kong: Commercial Press, 2007, ISBN 978-962-07-0277-8. (in Chinese)

seems aside the point and was entirely unused by the article, so I've left it here. Kindly restore it to the bibliography once it's being used to verify parts of the article with inline citations.

Presumably, Prusek and whoever wrote the article in Chinese Culture have more, even though Google only allows snippets of their text. — LlywelynII 20:29, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Date of conquest by Zhao

Xiong has 476 BC and Baidu and Baike.com have 475 BC, which may represent newer and better research but the large majority of English sources seem to place it in 457. There aren't very good sources or dates in the rulers' list at Zhao's article, but they seem to place Xiang closer to the 450s than 470s as well. — LlywelynII 14:33, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]