A fact from Da He ding appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 March 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the Da He ding(pictured), the only known ancient Chinese bronze decorated with human faces, was sold as scrap metal?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
As I said at WP:ERRORS,"the Da He ding is interesting and important, but are the bronze heads from Sanxingdui not sufficiently ancient, Chinese, or human faces? To put it another way, "only known ancient Chinese bronzeware to use human faces as decoration" is either wrong or POV. It seems to be based on Chinese language sources." 213.205.240.172 (talk) 09:20, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sanxingdui is not strictly speaking, "Chinese". Da He ding is inscribed with Chinese characters, but the earliest writing in the Sanxingdui/Sichuan region is the undeciphered, non-Chinese Ba-Shu scripts. But you're right that Sanxingdui is in modern China and usually considered Chinese in a broad sense. I've changed "bronzeware" to "bronze cauldron" to avoid confusion. -Zanhe (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Did you see Fram's comment and link to a book that mentions other Shang dynasty bronzes depicting human faces, although from what I can see thay are not cauldrons. Here are some examples; there are also some bronzes from Xingan; and you might also consider Taotie to be faces, some more human than others. Jessica Rawson seems to have written a fair amount about faces in ancient Chinese bronzes. 213.205.240.172 (talk) 18:07, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I saw Fram's comment referring to The Cambridge History of Ancient China, which I've read in its entirety. The ubiquitous taotie in Shang bronzes is not generally considered human and is typically depicted in a highly abstract form. Also, the term ancient Chinese bronzeware often refers only to ritual vessels, to the exclusion of figurines, masks, weapons, coins, etc. In any case, I've already changed "bronzeware" to "bronze cauldron" to avoid the ambiguities. -Zanhe (talk) 05:05, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
