Talk:DO-248B
 | The contents of the DO-248B page were merged into DO-248 on 29 August 2020 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Requested move 18 January 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move. Aervanath (talk) 14:44, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
DO-248B → ? – The item has been updated to Rev C with a completely new title, the page should be DO-248 or DO-248C. IveGoneAway (talk) 15:42, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
The present page is 6 years out-of-date. My simple response is to suggest a new page DO-248 that then describes the present DO-248C (which may be updated to DO-248D with the DO-178D release, should that occur). I don't have a detailed vision yet of how different DO-248B is from DO-248C: much of the original FAQ seems little changed, but not only does it now cover the new considerations of DO-178C, it now also encompass DO-278A. IveGoneAway (talk) 15:55, 18 January 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 21:27, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- "?" is also my reaction to the contents of the page. Is there anything salvageable here as encyclopedic content? The topic of the article is opaque based upon the current contents, and lines like "Qualification of a Tool Using Service History" don't seem to add much. I'd suggest redirecting if this can't be improved upon. Dekimasuよ! 16:38, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.