Talk:DIYbio (organization)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
More references
[edit]I have removed some of my older posts from this talk/comment page in exchange for some properly formatted citations of the news articles. Look into the previous revisions if you want to find just plain links to the articles. I hope some of this proves interesting fuel for the article. -- kanzure (talk) 01:52, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
I have updated this list of references at [1]. These can be used in the article by wrapping each reference with <ref name="anchor-name"></ref>. -- kanzure (talk) 01:31, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
- Johnson, Carolyn Y. (2008-09-15). "Accessible science". The Boston Globe. Retrieved 2010-03-29.
- Annalee Newitz (2008-06-06). "A Homebrew Club for Biogeeks". io9. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Johnson, Carolyn Y. (2010-04-26). "Amateurs explore their genomes via DNA cocktail". The Boston Globe. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Woese, C. R. (2004). "A New Biology for a New Century". Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 68 (2): 173–186. doi:10.1128/MMBR.68.2.173-186.2004. ISSN 1092-2172. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- "Biohacking: harmless hobby or global threat?". RT Top Stories. 2009-05-14. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Todd Kuiken (2010-03-11). "BioSecurity: How synthetic biology is changing the way we look at biology and biological threats". Nanotechnology Now. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Ariel Bleicher (2010-02-26). "Biotech on a Budget". Scienceline. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- David ten Have (2010-06-21). "Biotech Tools". Ponoko. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Jeremy Jacquot (2010-06-16). "Bringing Biohacking to the Masses". Discover Magazine - Science Not Fiction. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Michelle Williams et al. (2010-05-04). "Citizen Scientists Attract FBI's WMD Unit". National Journal. 4min 34sec minutes in. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
{{cite episode}}
: Explicit use of et al. in:|authors=
(help)
- Mike Szczys (2010-06-11). "Cockroach pimps a sweet ride". Hackaday. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Alexandra Carmichael (2010-07-04). "Curing Cancer in a Garage?". Institute for the Future. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Tyson Anderson (2009-06-15). "Darning Genes: Biology for the Homebody". H+ Magazine. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Parijata D. Mackey (2010-01-22). "DIY Bio: A Growing Movement Takes on Aging". H+ Magazine. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Patti Schiendelman (2009-01-01). "DIYBio for biohackers". Make: Online. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Brendan I. Koerner (2009-01-19). "DIY DNA: One Father's Attempt to Hack His Daughter's Genetic Code". Wired Magazine. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Aaron Saez (2009-04-28). "Do It Yourself Biohacking". Singularity Hub. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Julian Guthrie (2009-12-20). "Do-it-yourself biology grows with technology". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Mooallem, Jon (2010-02-14). "Do-It-Yourself Genetic Engineering". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- "Do-It-Yourself Genetic Engineering". The New York Times. 2010-03-07. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Schick, Charlie (2010-06-21). "Do we need a DIYbio academy?". Molecularist. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Gary Richmond (2009-06-02). "Extending the free software paradigm to DIY Biology". Free Software Magazine. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Schwartz, John (2008-08-22). "Fish Tale Has DNA Hook: Students Find Bad Labels". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Greg Campbell (2010-02-16). "From Hackerspace To Your Garage: Downloading DIY Hardware Over the Web". H+ Magazine. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Cnu (2010-04-09). "Garage Biology". subrealism. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- "Garage Biology Bad for Science?". GenomeWeb DailyScan. 2010-03-24. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Rob Carlson (2010-03-08). "Garage Biology in Silicon Valley". Synthesis. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Derek Lowe (2010-03-12). "Garage Biotech". In The Pipeline. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Paul Raven (2009-05-15). "Garage ribofunk – the rise of homebrew genetic engineering". Futurismic. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Stew Magnuson (2010-06-01). "Growing Public Interest In Genetic Science Sparks Some Bio-Security Concerns". National Defense Magazine. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Thesoulhacker (2010-04-09). "Hacking DNA". Biotechnology View. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- David Pescovitz (2010-07-05). "Help fund a hackerspace for biology". Boing Boing. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Jeremy Garwood (2009-02-16). "Homemade Molecular Biology Labs aim to create Synthetic Life". Lab Times Online. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Whalen, Jeanne (2009-05-12). "In Attics and Closets, 'Biohackers' Discover Their Inner Frankenstein". wsj.com. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- "In Attics and Closets, 'Biohackers' Prove the Spirit of Thomas Edison Endures". The Week In Ideas. 2009-05-18. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- David Pescovitz (2010-03-02). "Inexpensive gene copier for DIY molecular biology". Boing Boing. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Christina Agapakis (2010-03-23). "Knowledge is Power : Oscillator". Oscillator. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Dale Doughtery (2010-05-20). "Make-offs: DIY indie innovations". O'Reilly Radar. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Kyle Munkittrick (2010-06-01). "Not-So-Scary Synthetic Life". Pop Transhumanism. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- "Open-Source Lab Promises Free DNA Parts for Bioengineers". Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Erika Hayasaki (2007-11-05). "Patient's vision: Treating cancer without chemo". Seattle Times. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Andrew Hessel (2009-12-09). "Reinventing the Pharmaceutical Industry, without the Industry". Futurst Magazine. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. "Responsible Science for Do-It-Yourself Biologists". PR News Wire. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Phil McKenna (2009-01-07). "Rise of the garage genome hackers". New Scientist. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Rob Carlson (2005-05-01). "Splice it yourself". Wired Magazine. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Tom Bearden (2008-12-30). "Students, Scientists Build Biological 'Machines'". PBS News Hour. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Russell M. Davies (2009-08-11). "Synthetic biology will bring us a slimy, moist future". wired.co.uk. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Guy Raz (2009-12-27). "Taking Biological Research Out Of The Laboratory". NPR. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Mark Ward (2010-03-31). "Tech Know: Life hacking". BBC. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Elizabeth Cohen (2009-06-11). "Teen diagnoses her own disease in science class". CNN.com. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Greg Boustead (2008-12-11). "The Biohacking Hobbyist". Seed Magazine. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- "The geneticist in the garage". 2009-03-19. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
{{cite web}}
: Text "Technology" ignored (help); Text "The Guardian" ignored (help)
- Sonia Arrison (2010-06-30). "The New Hacker Hobby That Will Change the World". Technology News. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Joseph P. Jackson (2010-07-07). "The Open Science Shift". Xconomy. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- John Mauldin (2010-03-07). "The promise of biotech". Moneyweb.com. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- "The Tumbling Walls of Formal Science". Fight Aging!. 2010-06-07. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- "The Wild World of DIY Synthetic Biology". Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Aaron Saez (2009-04-29). "Who is DIYbio.org?". Singularity Hub. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Ronald Bailey (2010-05-25). "Who's Afraid of Synthetic Biology?". Reason Magazine. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
- Andrew Hessel (2010-01-25). "Why DIY Bio?". H+ Magazine. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
Also, I can't seem to get this formatted correctly as a bullet point through wikisyntax:
* General Fabb (2010-04-09). "3D Printing Aids Biohacking". Fabbaloo. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
criticism section
[edit]"closing the door on the profound positive impacts that distributed biological technology will have on human health, the environment, and the standard of living around the world" Seems a bit over the top & POV. Whole section is like that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Westfablomka (talk • contribs) 03:58, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Questionable "Examples" section
[edit]Per this complaint[2] on the DIYbio list, I've removed the following, and fact-tagged it.
- The following examples of do-it-yourself biology projects will give a better understanding of what exactly DIYbio is all about. An Irish bio-hacker named Cathal Garvey created an adapter that can be printed on a MakerBot (or any 3D printer). When attached to a Dremel tool it creates a centrifuge capable of performing to the standard of many lab standard models. This creation dropped the price of a centrifuge from thousands to a few dollars and made the technology much more widely available.[1]
- Other examples of bio-hacker creations include printable hip-replacement joints [2] and a process that allows DNA extraction to be performed in a shot glass.[citation needed]
Per WP:PRESERVE, I've copied it here. The relevance of 3D printing of non-organic body-part replacements doesn't seem to be within scope for this article. And should there even be an "Examples" section? Shouldn't that sort of the thing be threaded through the entire text of the article? Yakushima (talk) 01:16, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
- I agree that the examples should be throughout the article. Nathan McCorkle re-authored the section to link to projects cited in the news like openpcr, spikerbox, dremelfuge, openspectrometer, pearlbiotech's things, otyp's whateverdoohickey etc. My recent edit was to fix his merge, but shouldn't be misinterpreted as a disagreement with your comments. -- kanzure (talk) 04:53, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
- OK, so since you don't disagree, and since we haven't yet agreed on what to do about what I deleted, I'll delete it again. Yakushima (talk) 05:01, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
- And in the process deleted a recent change to the problematic passage. Yikes! Yakushima (talk) 05:06, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
- OK, so since you don't disagree, and since we haven't yet agreed on what to do about what I deleted, I'll delete it again. Yakushima (talk) 05:01, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
- I agree that the examples should be throughout the article. Nathan McCorkle re-authored the section to link to projects cited in the news like openpcr, spikerbox, dremelfuge, openspectrometer, pearlbiotech's things, otyp's whateverdoohickey etc. My recent edit was to fix his merge, but shouldn't be misinterpreted as a disagreement with your comments. -- kanzure (talk) 04:53, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Here is the examples section after a few recent edits:
- An Irish bio-hacker named Cathal Garvey created an adapter that can be printed on a MakerBot (or any 3D printer). When attached to a Dremel tool it creates a centrifuge capable of performing to the standard of many lab standard models. This creation dropped the price of a centrifuge from thousands to a few dollars and made the technology much more widely available.[3] Josh Perfetto and Tito Jankowski created openPCR, a thermocycler device that heats and cools micro centrifuge tubes filled with PCR reaction mix to amplify DNA. This unit too compares with comparable commercial devices selling for more than 5 times the price.[4] SpikerBox is an amplifier kit for listening to the action potentials generated by neurons.[5] The Pearl Biotech gel electrophoresis box is another example of a key biotech lab item.[6]
- ^ "DremelFuge DIY-centrifuge Spins the Best!". 21-Mar-2010.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "Thingiverse: DIY Hip replacement".
- ^ "DremelFuge DIY-centrifuge Spins the Best!". 21-Mar-2010.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "Whip Up Some DNA With a Home PCR Machine". 27-Dec-2011.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "The SpikerBox: A Low Cost, Open-Source BioAmplifier for Increasing Public Participation in Neuroscience Inquiry". 21-Mar-2012.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "OPEN HARDWARE FOR MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EXPERIMENTS". 29-Oct-2009.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help)
If there's agreement that examples should be spread throughout the article, this talk page can at least start collecting and filtering them. Yakushima (talk) 06:31, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
From the DIYbio list discussion of improvement of this article ("Re: [DIYbio] Current examples of DIYbio that I see, what others do people see?")
- "Cory Tobin of LA BioHackers experimented and produced a plasmid mini-prep extraction protocol using centrifugal ion chromatography with silica columns and common household ingredients.(http://wiki.biohackers.la/Miniprep)"
Contribution by Nathan McCorkle. Yakushima (talk) 07:01, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Scope of article
[edit]This article should be about the organization/website/mailing list specifically; text about the larger movement should be moved into Do-it-yourself biology. Does anybody have any guidance about how to separate the two? Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 01:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Also, I've noticed that none of the references in this article are actually third-party reliable sources about the organization itself. These will need to be provided if this is to remain as a separate article. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 02:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on DIYbio (organization). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121001040922/http://maradydd.livejournal.com/496085.html to http://maradydd.livejournal.com/496085.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on DIYbio (organization). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100612163650/http://www.ncbe.reading.ac.uk/NCBE/SAFETY/bacteria.html to http://www.ncbe.reading.ac.uk/NCBE/SAFETY/bacteria.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:23, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on DIYbio (organization). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100612125815/http://www.biopunk.org/ to http://www.biopunk.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- C-Class Alternative views articles
- Low-importance Alternative views articles
- WikiProject Alternative views articles
- C-Class organization articles
- Low-importance organization articles
- WikiProject Organizations articles
- C-Class Transhumanism articles
- Low-importance Transhumanism articles
- C-Class Biology articles
- Low-importance Biology articles
- WikiProject Biology articles