This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Comment: In view of the fact that no creating editor has edited since the end of April, I am accepting this and will flag for cleanup, referring to these comments on the talk page 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrentFaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:34, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Twenty nine references for seven paragraphs must be some sort of a record. You have created WP:BOMBARD and WP:CITEKILL, the latter in multiple places. Instead of Citekill we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. Three is not a target, it's a limit. Aim for one. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder.Moss is likely notable, so please ping me on my user talk page when you have sorted Bombard and Citekill out and I will accept the draft. There is no reason for it to anger awaiting a review.The over-referencing makes it truly hard to see the verification of the facts you have cited. The brain seizes up. We want an article that the reader can read with ease and follow the references with ease.My alternative to asking you to do the work is to accept it in this state and ask the community to do the work. I am willing to do that, if you ask me to do so, but I reckon you will be up to the challenge. Please use my user talk page to tell me what you decide to do 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrentFaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment: In view of the fact that no creating editor has edited since the end of April, I am accepting this and will flag for cleanup, referring to these comments on the talk page 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:34, 29 August 2024 (UTC)