Talk:Croatia–Iran relations

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV input

Rationale for this edit:

Masih Alinejad is British citizen with residence in the United States, her campaign is one-woman show and her fans are mostly Westerners, so alleged "Iranian women calling Pusich" is incorrect.
Mrs. Pusich and other Croatian politicians did not react to Alinejad's Facebook post. Neither did any other European or Australian delegation, because she is doing the same on Facebook every time when someone visit Iran, but no one pays attention except yellow journalists.
Every country has it's own diplomatic protocol (and dress code) so such remarks makes no sense, it's cheap politization.

Input is thus removed because it's WP:IRRELEVANT for bilateral relations, and I'm putting explanation here because personal conversation ended with primitive insults against Iranian men, women and scientists. --MehrdadFR (talk) 16:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The only one primitive here is this Mehrdad creature who believes that Wikipedia is a pamphlet of Iranian government. United Union (talk) 09:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]