Talk:Croatan High School

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists

Can we do something about these lists? They're rediculous. Strombollii (talk) 03:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Croatan Football

They competed in the state playoffs? In what year? What was the outcome? Was it JV or Varsity? Either make the addition informative or delete.--JimmyButler (talk) 13:10, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently -- or at least judging by the writing in the section -- Croatan's English department needs a stronger emphasis on the fundamentals of grammar. Strombollii (talk) 13:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more specific on what was wrong with the section.--11mwood (talk) 13:53, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inherent bias, nonfactual information, no refs (but I guess that's a non-issue).

The team was led by a group of experienced seniors two of which broke the record for season tackles at the cornerback position. The teams starting running back, Donnie Morris, was Croatan's first 1,000 yard rusher his junior year at croatan and and during the 2008-2009 season he led the team again in rush yards as a seanior.

Strombollii (talk) 14:00, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On a similar note, why is there a new club section that has not been incorporated into the pre-existing club list? A little inconsistent...

--Wikitrevor (talk) 13:52, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps some elaboration applied to each of the sports in order to ensure consistency in the article's structure. For instance, the wrestling team sub-section is supported by details, but other sports are in need of some supporting details. Also, every fact or statistical claim should be cited. Overall, the additions to the article are beneficial to its status, and the addition of new information is quite impressive. --Wikitrevor (talk) 22:41, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe adopt a format that's much like the Wikipedia:WikiProject AP Biology 2008 for usernames? That is, "Sport/Coach: Coach's name" or something to that effect. Other information could be placed underneath, bulleted.Strombollii (talk) 15:06, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ping Pong Club

Seriously?--JimmyButler (talk) 13:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FBLA

Deleted section. No factual information provided to copyedit. Strombollii (talk) 13:37, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposition

Wikitrev, can we do away with the ^{[citation needed]} tags? Yes, it is unsourced info; and yes, it probably should be sourced;o but it looks sloppy, and let's face it, no one is going to bother sourcing the information.

Furthermore, where'd the clubs go? Strombollii (talk) 21:01, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, sounds good. List of Clubs? I don't know who got rid of it. --Wikitrevor (talk) 23:37, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, that was me on a flying visit a few weeks back - it was unsourced, prospectus-ish and I didn't think it was especially notable (every school has a load of clubs - so what?) If you think it should go back in though, no worries ;) EyeSerene^talk 10:47, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]