Talk:Criticize Lin, Criticize Confucius

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

China: History Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (assessed as Low-importance).

Confusing

This is confusing... could someone clear it up?

futurebird 23:12, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done.Ferox Seneca (talk) 08:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

批孔揚秦

Why not mention the "批孔揚秦" campaign in this article? 173.89.236.187 (talk) 10:38, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First Paragraph Potentially Too Harsh/Biased In Tone?

Hello Fellow Wikipedians! It's come to my attention now that the first paragraph of this article may be a little too forceful to fit our neutrality principles, and, perhaps more importantly, also lacks any citations. The end of the first paragraph read: "The campaign produced detailed Maoist interpretations of Chinese history, and was used as a tool by the Gang of Four to attack their enemies." The first part of this sentence is suitable, but needs a proper citation nonetheless. The second part is not neutral enough in tone to stay even if properly cited. I'm removing the sentence for now, but I encourage a fellow Wikipedian to re-write the bit with proper citation. Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrbdt (talk • contribs) 22:33, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, just to note for any future contributors: words such as "attack" and "purge" suggest a tone of bias, and in principle should be used with caution in Wikipedia, if at all. Consider alternatives such as "Criticise". I've gone over the whole page to correct the tone, should be ok now:) (Though it still needs more citations) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrbdt (talk • contribs) 22:46, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]