Jump to content

Talk:Crash Bandicoot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Crash Bandicoot series)

Add Dave/David Siller to the credits list of the first game

[edit]

Please revert to the "Crediting Dave Siller, producer responsible for level designs and general conceptual development of the first game" revision and improve upon that or add it to the first game's wiki page please. 108.162.189.5 (talk) 22:25, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crash Not With Activision!

[edit]

On December 7th of 2013, the trademark was updated to 'Cancelled'. Activision no longer owns Crash Bandicoot.Trademark Search.

Not true, they still own it, but they cancelled some obsolete trademarks due to not being able to transfer ownership from Sierra:

http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4807:aoqhoe.2.1 108.162.189.5 (talk) 01:10, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Crash Online?

[edit]

Is the stuff about "Crash Online" true? If so can someone reference it? - Tud123 23:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC) It's a kinda long story. Visit hpzr.freeweb7.com(Crash Mania) and it's on the unrelaesed games section. 88.109.179.70 16:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it WAS in production; but it got cancelled. Josh Bandicoot 13:48, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Or it somehow evolved into Crash Village? Josh Bandicoot 16:57, 29 October 2007 (UTC) I came up with that idea too(what a coincidence)!88.110.0.176 18:03, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


VANDALISM. this page has been vandalised and i would appreciate it if it restored. example william gates? dildo land? --76.113.62.128 (talk) 00:27, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge of Lab Assistants (Crash character)

[edit]

The article Lab Assistants (Crash character) isn't notable by itself. Any useful information should be merged with this article and the Lab Assistants (Crash character)article redirected to this one --AbsolutDan (talk) 01:19, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - fancruft :) --Quirex 17:44, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like something for Wikibooks. DanPMK 04:02, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crash clossoum

[edit]

I heard this is a new game

You got a source or what? Cat's Tuxedo 02:55, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On Crash a pedia that is the source

Can you provide us of a URL of the site you found this information at?

This is extremely embarrasing, but that's my fangame, Crash Collosium. He must've went to the fangames section and seen it XP Kobb 22:25, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorrt about this misunderstanding —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.30.203.176 (talk) 01:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

question

[edit]

do you guys think that characters from Crash bandicoot can make it into brawl —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.141.16.251 (talk) 13:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's a brawl? Josh Bandicoot 13:49, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not "A" brawl, just "Brawl". CBFan 14:01, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think they're talking about the next Super Smash Bros game However, I highly dobut they will.88.110.0.176 18:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and they have a change he is better then Sonic —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.30.202.233 (talk) 00:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No offence, but this is Wikipedia, and we should'nt use talk pages for this sort of thing.ADBandicoot (talk) 18:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A bit ineutral...

[edit]

The characters underwent extreme appearance changes which received mixed opinions from fans.
I feel that saying it had extreme diffrences is rather inneutral. It should be changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ADBandicoot (talk • contribs) 17:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then I'll change it anyway. ADBandicoot (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Regards of the removal of Japanese Crash Bandicoot information.

[edit]

I thought I'd just make a post about it in here about it...

Someone has removed all the information pertaining to the Japanese version of Crash Bandicoot games, and I seriously do not want to go through every single article to revert these changes. I refixed the entry in Crash 3, but this is because I was able to backtrack the information.

There has always been a reason that the information was provided, and now it has been suddenly removed without reason. I was fighting over a change made to the Crash Bandicoot 3 entry, as the person kept on removing the japanese title given for the series. Now it seems after I had made the statement in the talkback entry as to why I kept reverting his change, the person has went through almost every single entry, removing every trace of the Japanese information in regards to Crash Bandicoot. This bothers me, not because simply the fact the information probably shouldn't be included, given this is an english wiki, but the informaiton has been provided as a whole for a long time. The information that has been affected were mainly the voice cast and title listings.

I don't really support this change, as he did not even give a single arguement for the changes made to the wiki Articals. Another reason I do not support the change is that while the game is indeed american made, the Crash Bandicoot games have always been popular in the Asian territory (which use the Japanese localization). And if anyone wished to look up information inregards to the Japanese version, wikipedia was an easy source to look for this information. If anyone could restore the information that was provided in the past, this would be great. 71.72.38.203 (talk) 00:06, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oy, What's this then?

[edit]

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Crash_Bandicoot_%28series%29#GamerLine_Studio

Source please? Jumpbutton (talk) 04:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crash: Invasion of the Bandicoot Snatchers

[edit]

I heard there's a new game called Crash: Invasion of the Bandicoot Snatchers? I found that on YouTube? Any idea on it's storyline? SuperSaiyanCrash 16:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment, no information on the plot has been revealed, though judging from the pattern of recent Crash games, some significant info should be released in the middle of spring this year. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 14:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiQuote

[edit]

Why are the WikiQuotes for Crash Bandicoot deleted? Xlittlecloudx (talk) 20:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Games' section - covers

[edit]

Forgive me if I'm missing something, as I don't come on wikipedia that often, but as the covers of each game were fine on the games respective pages, what exactly was wrong with their use on this page?

Thanks :) Assassin Droid talk 15:01, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


One of the game's cover was deleted, apparently. --Yowuza ZX Wolfie 15:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sales

[edit]

This article says that the Crash sreries has sold 40 million copies, but it has said that since late 2007. It has probably sold more by now. TwinTitans (talk) 12:28, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's undoubtedly true, but we need to wait for an official source to give a higher number in sales before we can do anything about it. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 01:13, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Playstation 3

[edit]

Seems odd that there has been no game on the PS3 yet, has there been much discussion on this? AJUK Talk!! 21:52, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully Crash will go to the PS3 this year, but I have a feeling that it will be another stupid Nintendo DS exclusive. TwinTitans (talk) 10:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coco Bandicoot Game?

[edit]

Can you, please, find a reference for this game? It's a bit confusing - it says it is already released, but in September 2009...MR.CRO95 (talk) 13:52, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reference because it doesn't exist. Unsurprisingly, the entry has since been removed. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crash Bandicoot 2009

[edit]

Is there any news of a new crash game in 2009? new games are useally revealed in april, but i have seen and heard nothing. Y2J The Evil Twin (talk) 07:52, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet. In fact, I don't think we'll be getting the next Crash game until next year. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 10:34, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So you mean 2009 will be the first year without a Crash game since 1996?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.89.136.211 (talk) 20:03, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you count the mobile game Crash Bandicoot: Mutant Island coming out this September, it most likely will be. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 21:19, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crash or Crash Bandicoot

[edit]

I think that the name of this article should be changed to Crash Bandicoot (series). Most of the important games are called Crash Bandicoot: ______. The Sierra games, Crash Boom Bang!, and Crash Nitro Kart are the only ones to not have Bandicoot in them, and most of those are spin-offs. There's no doubt that the next Crash game won't have Bandicoot because it will be made by Sierra, but I still think it should be changed. Sabertooth1000000000 (talk) 02:02, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Crash Bandicoot
  • Crash Bandicoot 2: Cortex Strikes Back
  • Crash Bandicoot 3: Warped
  • Crash Team Racing
  • Crash Bash
  • Crash Bandicoot: The Wrath of Cortex
  • Crash Bandicoot: The Huge Adventure
  • Crash Bandicoot 2: N-Tranced
  • Crash Nitro Kart
  • Crash Bandicoot Purple: Ripto's Rampage
  • Crash Twinsanity
  • Crash Tag Team Racing
  • Crash Boom Bang!
  • Crash of the Titans
  • Crash: Mind over Mutant

That makes 7 out of 15 games with Bandicoot in the title, which is less than half of the games in the series. If the next game has the word Bandicoot in it, maybe we'll change our minds. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 20:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What you said about Sierra is biased, it isn't down to Sierra that its just called Crash it's because its easier to say, besides, in some places Crash: mind over mutant is extended to Crash Bandicoot: Mind over Mutant, but, other than you biasedness I Agree, Most Sonic games don't have The Hedgehog in the title but the series is still called Sonic the Hedgehog —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.9.196.38 (talk) 14:27, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citations for Common gameplay elements

[edit]

To quote Wikipedia:Verifiability, "Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, or the material may be removed." This section covers basic information about how the games are played, and gameplay mechanics that are present throughout the series, not wild claims that could be easily refuted. The games' instruction manuals could be cited as references, but I don't think it's necessary. --Faxwell23 (talk) 03:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, there'll definitely be some debate over what gameplay elements could be considered 'common'. [[User:Cat's Tuxedo|]] (talk) 04:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: don't move this page, but change Crash Bandicoot to a disambig Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:34, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{movereq}}

Crash Bandicoot (series) → Crash Bandicoot — Since the launch of the first game Crash Bandicoot has developed into a wide series consisting of numerous games and a wide variety of spin-offs. Thus Crash Bandicoot is now more commonly referred to as a series rather than as simply the first game. The move is also supported by the disambiguation section of the naming conventions for the series. Hence the first game should be moved to Crash Bandicoot (video game) and the series page should be moved to Crash Bandicoot. An example of how this has been done before is that Final Fantasy directs to the series page while the first game, Final Fantasy is under Final Fantasy (video game) KiasuKiasiMan (talk) 12:30, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think Sonic the Hedgehog would be a better example to follow than Final Fantasy. The name "Sonic the Hedgehog" can refer to the game series, one of the games in that series, the character itself, or any number of similarly named concepts. The Sonic the Hedgehog wiki serves as a disambiguation page for all of them. So I think Crash Bandicoot (series) is fine right where it is, as is Crash Bandicoot (character). But moving Crash Bandicoot → Crash Bandicoot (video game) would make sense, if Crash Bandicoot were to be turned into a disambiguation page.
Another alternative, if you don't believe that a disambiguation page would be required in this instance, would be to move Crash Bandicoot → Crash Bandicoot (video game), turn Crash Bandicoot into a redirect to Crash Bandicoot (series), and leave the about template currently at the top of that page to serve as appropriate disambiguation. 69.181.227.133 (talk) 22:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the anon. --Yowuza yadderhouse | meh 10:38, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, make Crash Bandicoot a disambiguation page. Ucucha 10:38, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

CTR 2010

[edit]

first of all how is this not a reliable source? It tells us whats happening and it even shows a member of the team? Tell me? And don't move anything.

From what I can guess, resumes aren't usually considered reliable sources. Gaming journalist sites (such as GameSpot or IGN), however, are. It'd be best to wait until an official announcement about this comes around. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 04:28, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hey I emailed the guy and he says that the game is done. They just have to wait for it to be published. And I am not giving out my email password! --Schmeater (talk) 01:09, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Guys, why has the section on CTR been copypasted over with the section from CB:Warped? Anyone able to revert the change? Laserhead (talk) 03:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Crash Bandicoot (series)

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Crash Bandicoot (series)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Gamershell":

  • From Crash: Mind over Mutant: "Overview: Crash: Mind Over Mutant Q&A". Gamer's Hell. Retrieved July 7, 2008.
  • From Coco Bandicoot: "Overview: Crash: Mind over Mutant Q&A". Gamer's Hell. Retrieved 2009-03-22. The only thing we weren't able to squeeze into the game was Coco as the second playable character in coop mode. It's not her character model that's the problem, but animations. To make Coco believable as a platforming, fighting character we felt she needed her own combat style and moves. It would have looked too weird if she moved the exact same way Crash does. And so she has her own animations. She looks great, but animations take a lot of memory.

Reference named "Joystiq":

Reference named "IGNPreview":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Music/compositions of Crash Bandicoot

[edit]

There should be a page or at least a section for information on the music/compositions on the crash bandicoot games... Anyone else think that? -Sp3nc3rp0tts (talk) 15:35, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crash sales

[edit]

according to the VGChartz website all the first 5 orignal crash bandicoot games have sold well over what has been stated on this article for example, it states crash warped has sold 3.87 million units however it has sold well over 7.2 million units worldwide can someone update them please, the psn sales have also sold approximetly 1.2 million —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.3.240.198 (talk) 14:04, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notable fan games

[edit]

Should we or should we not include the notable fan-created games like Flash, Retro and Returns? They have made an impact on Crash's image, in my opinion. These games work as footholders to keep people interested in Crash games while we are all waiting for the official one. In fact, there exists an interview of Andy Gavin and Jason Rubin regarding their thoughts in Returns, which is created by a French student. FinnsDeal (talk) 15:15, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would like a link to this interview. If the publisher of the interview can be deemed reliable, then we'll include information on the fangame into the article. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 18:48, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a section to the article regarding it, but was reverted to the original version. This is the link to the interview made by GiantBomb. FinnsDeal (talk) 23:44, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think we should. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.175.236.212 (talk) 11:11, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for protection

[edit]

Because a certain IP address would not stop separating Crash of the Titans and Crash: Mind over Mutant from the main series without any given explanation, I'm requesting that the page be protected from editing by unregistered users for a few months to discourage any further vandalism of the sort. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 13:04, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

[edit]

Added templates in three sections of the article as it isn't written very objectively or in formal tone. It also repeats information repeatedly, especially when it comes to how the games were received, and over uses the words "critically acclaimed". So please don't remove them till they have been sorted out. - Jak Fisher (talk • contribs) 21:08, 4 January, 2012‎ (UTC)

Requested move 2

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 06:29, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The series is surely the primary topic. Last month it was viewed over 55,000 times. [1] In comparison, the disambiguation page was viewed less than a third of that - 16,578. [2] That was even less than what the original video game got - 20,755 views. [3] Even though it's not relevant to my original point I might as well mention that the character got 10,110 views. [4] Unreal7 (talk) 14:25, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually now that I think of it, maybe the character should be PT, despite the views. Mario is PT ahead of his games. Unreal7 (talk) 00:29, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No wait I was right first time, the series is primary. Unreal7 (talk) 16:19, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Request for Protection

[edit]

I wish to make a Request for Protection to stop a certain fanboy IP continuously vandalising the page, claiming Activision has abandoned the series. Blocking that IP would be no good because the IP uses so many. 88.109.17.78 (talk) 20:37, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Protection...Again

[edit]

And, as soon as the thread has been unprotected, the fanboy IP is back badmouthing Activision again. This thread needs to be protected perminantly at this rate. 88.109.23.231 (talk) 16:40, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Protection...For a third time

[edit]

As soon as the page is unprotected the same IP is back vandalising Activisions ownership again. It is just plain annoying at this stage. Thanks. Jak Fisher (talk) 14:55, 11 June, 2013 (UTC)

What are we meant to do?

[edit]

It's obvious this guy is the same guy just using multiple IPs, but how are we supposed to ban him when he keeps constantly changing them? We can't. 88.109.26.77 (talk) 20:25, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the current ownership of the series.

[edit]

i suggest the entry to remains protected, Activision just removed all mention of the series from its servers. so is best to maintain some discretion regarding the ownership until its confirmed that the series are still owned by Activision or not. --Chuky Master (talk) 09:02, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

[edit]

It has been confirmed that Activision still owns the Crash Bandicoot IP, as shown here: http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2013/11/22/activision-still-owns-crash-bandicoot.aspx

98.243.149.71 (talk) 15:03, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: That source seems less than reliable. Can you provide a more mainstream source? Thanks, Celestra (talk) 22:58, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About Activision

[edit]

"Activision has however, confirmed that they still own the series and are currently looking for ways to bring the series back." Where is proof? Give the link for REAL proof (from Activision, not from Gameinformer. Their article doesn't have screenshotes, interview and true words.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.54.226.75 (talk) 18:21, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4807:aoqhoe.2.1 108.162.189.5 (talk) 01:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What tell about this?

[edit]

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=636733946389341&set=a.125492390846835.20223.106012082794866&type=1&theater Interesting, isn't? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.65.217.80 (talk) 19:46, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to do with anything. 85.210.188.34 (talk) 07:15, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Publishers

[edit]

Sierra published Crash tag team, Mind over Mutant, and Crash of the titans. Activision published the two IOS racing games. I noticed these companies are missing. JakIIDax (talk) 17:24, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 July 2014

[edit]

Hello, The mobile game "Crash Bandicoot: Mutant Island" has been developed by Vivendi Games Mobile and published by Glu Mobile, and not the other way around as indicated in the article. I was the producer on this title. The Pocketgamer review linked in the sources has it right though : http://www.pocketgamer.co.uk/r/Mobile/Crash+Bandicoot%3A+Mutant+Island/review.asp?c=14436

Thanks for your help. Serialcleaner (talk) 13:31, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 05:32, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 July 2014

[edit]

Vicki Winters has her own website MyBigFatMouth (talk) 14:56, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: This page is about Crash Bandicoot, not Vicki Winters, who is only mentioned once in the article. - Arjayay (talk) 16:19, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Publishers (again)

[edit]

"Sony Computer Entertainment (1996–2000, >2014-present<)" Where is the proof? Article with this information? Or something like that — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.65.216.203 (talk) 14:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Activision being the current publishers

[edit]

Since for a while now several IPs have been changing the infobox information to state Activision are not the current publishers of the Crash Bandicoot franchise and/or stating that Sony are the current publishers of the franchise (something that cannot be proven as of now), I have created this section for anyone that wants to discuss/dispute Activision being the current publishers of the franchise. --Andromedabluesphere440 (talk) 16:41, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Activision still holds the only active trademark for Crash Bandicoot. Activision is the publisher that holds the current rights. http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4808:w8hrno.2.5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calvinhermse (talk • contribs) 17:57, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Character Table is pointless and unnecessary.

[edit]

OK, since people clearly can't seem to understand why this is a bad idea, let me spell it out for you guys. There's multiple reasons why trying to have a character table just doesn't work.

  • The obvious problem, it's too big. Can't you guys see that to view it properly, you have to scroll the entire page sideways? That kinda defeats the entire purpose of even having it in the first place.
  • The other major problem I have is that this is completely unnecessary. Think about it...is there a table like this for Mario? No, of course not. Sonic doesn't have one either. Neither do the likes of MegaMan or heck, even Spyro doesn't have one of these. So there is no reason why Crash should be a special exception. The only way these tables can really work is with fighting game franchises, and as surprised that I am that there hasn't been a fighting game amongst it, the Crash Bandicoot series is not that genre.
  • Finally, this is a nitpick, but there is no such character as "Emperor Velo XXIVV".

So, please, this table is pointless, now can we please stop adding it? It's too long and is inconsistent with other articles. 85.210.179.198 (talk) 06:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MacDonald's video game titles

[edit]

I want you to add the Crash Bandicoot McDonald's spin off titles such as crash bandicoot soccor and the other ones Hackulater (talk) 06:37, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crash Bandicoot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Crash Bandicoot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 18 external links on Crash Bandicoot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Crash Bandicoot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:40, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 June 2020

[edit]

Beenox should be changed to 2019; 2020 instead of just 2020 because they are now confirmed to be working on It’s About Time. 2607:FEA8:421F:E4D8:78BB:1891:7DD7:829F (talk) 03:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. GoingBatty (talk) 00:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

clarification

[edit]

Crash Bandicoot: The Wrath of Cortex was originally in development by Traveller's Tales. After a falling-out between Universal Interactive and the two entities, Traveller's Tales was forced...

what two entities? this sentence is poorly worded 68.8.90.211 (talk) 10:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 16:15, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Sparks Gaming the System

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2022 and 16 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ktapia-becerril (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Ashmarc (talk) 19:57, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Crash_Bandicoot&oldid=1201211234"