Talk:Craftivism

Textile arts Low‑importance

	Clothing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile artsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile artsTemplate:WikiProject Textile artsTextile arts articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Some relevant discussion on the definition of craftivism, and what might constitute craftivism:

These might provide some ideas for expanding this article. —GrantNeufeld (talk) 05:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is very difficult with a relatively new topic, but articles should reference reliable sources. References to forum posts or comments fall short of the guidelines at WP:RS. The JPS ^{talk to me} 01:06, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

inline links

I removed the inline links in the article and changed them to references per the Manual of Style. The references could probably do with a clean up in terms of formatting. If that is done and additional citations are added, the article could probably easily get to C or B status. --LauraHale (talk) 20:32, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Content removed

I removed the set of instructions on 'how to knit a hand grenade' from this article, as Wikipedia is not supposed to contain 'how-to' content. Robofish (talk) 18:47, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Craftivism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713153258/http://www.kirstyrobertson.com/viral%20knitting/viral%20knitting.html to http://www.kirstyrobertson.com/viral%20knitting/viral%20knitting.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:36, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Translations to foreign languages

French = artisanat (or bricolage) + activisme
- artisanisme ? brico-activisme ? Artisanat activiste ? Artisactivisme ?
German = Handwerk (or Basteln) + Aktivismus
- Handwerkaktivismus ? Haktivismus ? Bastelaktivismus ?
Spanish: actiartesanismo? (from here)

The italian version does mention DIY (Basteln, bricolage)

I am asking because it might be interesting to translate this article. Of course, it's not Wikipedia's role to invent new words in other languages, but maybe someone here is aware of good translations, which could be less literal of course (I cannot find any reference) greetings ! - Daniel K. Schneider 17:26, 1 March 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel K. Schneider (talk • contribs)