Talk:Corunna High School

Michigan Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

So is the school cool?

No...

i love this page just for all the random graffiti. no matter how many times i've seen that somebody's edited it back to normal, somebody else always has to come and make me laugh. well done.

Controversy

Extremely POV. This section could be saved if there's any media coverage about student dissent at Corunna, but otherwise, this section needs to go. ObtuseAngle 16:32, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article should stay. Blocking the site is Extremely POV so why not let them express a very supported opinion? The article deifnately should stay if there is not any offensive material to a certain individual or group of individuals. It's our first ammendment, something that can never be taken away.

While I'm sympathetic to the problem of being blocked from even using Wikipedia, these pages are for fact, not opinion. Try reading this: WP:NOT, with special attention to 1.4 (Wikipedia is not a soapbox). I did not delete this section entirely because I wanted to see if anybody could provide some links to articles in which student dissatisfaction at Corunna is discussed. If so, then this section changes from POV to fact. If not, not. A lot of editors would've just deleted this section as biased. I didn't want to do that on the off chance that there was something to this. If you or someone else can provide links to media coverage about student dissent, I'll withdraw my POV claim. However, the way the section is currently written, it only tells one side of the story. Why did Corunna ban its students from using Wikipedia? So even if it's kept, it will have to be rewritten. That's why I tagged the section for not being neutral and described it on this page as being extremely POV. ObtuseAngle 00:58, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm giving this four more days (to 10 Oct). If there is no corroborating information regardng these policy changes, I'm deleting the Controversy section. Ball's in your court. Without independent confirmation of student dissent, this section is opinion and has no place in the article. ObtuseAngle 22:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia was banned at our school because of what you see on the page now, as well as other sundry vandalism commited by some students at the school. There is no media coverage of the discontent at the school, nor is any likely. While everything in the offending section is factually true, in respect for the neutrality and "no original research" policies of Wikipedia, I'll remove it. (Just for the record, I didn't write it.)Biblioholic 22:17, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Corunna High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130825174002/http://chs.corunna.k12.mi.us/pages/corunnahs to http://chs.corunna.k12.mi.us/pages/corunnahs

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]