Talk:Coromandel Express

India: Railways Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Trains

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coromandel Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140408180437/http://www.indianrail.gov.in/ to http://www.indianrail.gov.in

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Coromandal exp.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:55, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removing citation needed links?

@Anonymous user 45.64.224.119 - that first sentence needs citations. There is no obvious evidence for some of those statements. You keep on removing the tags. Any reason for this, or can you cite any evidence? - Master Of Ninja (talk) 13:57, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Anonymous user 45.64.224.119 - seeing that you wish to remove (the what I think is appropriate) tags to identify that the text needs citations. Do you wish to discuss why you think the text doesn't need citations? - Master Of Ninja (talk) 21:15, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(retrospect) Note that have asked for protection. WP admins don't feel necessary presently. - Master Of Ninja (talk) 22:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look let me clear you few things about Coromandel Express, it is actually a flagship train, flagship trains are those trains which gets high priority. You are changing the train to a named train which is wrong. Your information is wrong. I have being traveling by this train since my childhood. You are removing the loco link section as well and speed section as well. You are removing many important facts about the train which is present since the page was created 150.129.64.75 (talk) 19:22, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where's your evidence / proof that it is a "flagship" train? Is there guidance from Indian Railways what a "flagship train" is, and it is documented that these get the highest priority? I appreciate your lived experience, however there is a level of evidence needed to write statements in wikipedia - see Wikipedia:Verifiability. If a statement can't be evidenced then it shouldn't be on the page. I do note that there are lots of pages without good evidence, but the whole point of an encyclopaedia is to be a reliable source - and so this relies on evidence. - Master Of Ninja (talk) 08:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So what evidence do you have that your source alone is right? Go and ask any IR senior official, I have many known higher officials who work for IR and whatever they said is correct. 150.129.64.75 (talk) 08:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So the sources I've used back-up the statements that the source is next to. In reality if the statement can't be sourced it should be deleted - as per Wikipedia:Verifiability actually a lot of this article should be removed until a reliable source is found. I note I used the word "named" as the train has a name - I have removed this. However it still comes down to if someone with no topic experience reads this, they might be misled. Asking an IR official is not a reliable source in this context. - Master Of Ninja (talk) 17:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You are posting newspaper article sources. There are many more points which you are not allowing to keep, you are actually providing half information. 150.129.64.75 (talk) 19:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have removed 90% information and customized it in your own way plz let me correct some of your information 150.129.64.75 (talk) 19:16, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You must not insert your opinion or other unsourced material. Further, you must stop removing existing content and citations. If you feel something needs to be corrected, either properly provide sources to support your edit, or suggest it here on the talk page. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 21:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You yourself are actually interested in providing your half information that are collected from news paper after the recent accident, but I have visited the Indian Railways museum in Kolkata. Their I have seen the entire history of Coromandel Express. IR Official database is not wrong. You yourself are thinking you alone are right and your sources are genuine. IR official records are more genuine and yes you also have provided many wrong information which does not match the IR museum's official data. 150.129.64.75 (talk) 01:44, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your personal experience aside, multiple editors have reverted you and warned about your actions. Please stop inserting this material and consider providing reliable sources to support your claims. Discuss here, don't just reinsert the disputed content. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 03:58, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you alone are not right I am also right,You have changed the stoppage according to you, your sources are more disputed to me, from where did the Coromandel name came you are removing it, you are also not allowing to keep the loco links section and speed section as well. You are actually providig half information wrong. 150.129.64.75 (talk) 04:05, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You must keep my information as well keep your and my information as well because you have removed many things which I added. 150.129.64.75 (talk) 04:07, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to be disruptive, rather than understanding the policies and guidance provided you here (and on your talk page). Continue this way, you'll likely get blocked. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 13:55, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May be but you have provided wrong information about route as well because you think you alone are right. Do whatever you want to do because you are wrong I will say it repeatedly. 150.129.64.75 (talk) 15:30, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As noted repeatedly, if there are factual errors to correct, then provide reliable sources to confirm. But also you cannot add personal experience or editorializing. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 15:37, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not only that you have removed many vital sections, you alone are not right, my information is also right as per IR museum history which is more accurate and yes you first need to check the timetable of Coromandel Express as well because you have removed details about route. 150.129.64.75 (talk) 15:56, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your continued disruption has been reported. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 16:24, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all. I was away for a few days, and I have come back to this. To the anonymous editor 150.129.64.75 - personally I would be happy if you contribute, but as pointed out you need to quote reliable sources. Read the reliable sources page to get an idea of how best to do this. I appreciate you have been to the IR museum, however the reader needs to have a citation to follow-up information. Otherwise how can we at least develop a chain of trust to say that this information is correct. If you do wish to contribute I would suggest creating a formal user account and editing with good citations. - Master Of Ninja (talk) 15:39, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]