This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
The lack of a lead section means that a reader who stumbles on this casually will have no idea what it is about. Even sci I accepted it on the basis that main space will improve it and draft space is unlikely to. This is patently a specialist topic, and reviewers tend to be generalist, with important exceptions. It would have been difficult to find a reviewer versed in the topic to give a more detailed review FiddleTimtrentFaddleTalk to me20:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]