Talk:Coppell Independent School District

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Dallas-Fort Worth (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dallas-Fort WorthWikipedia:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthTemplate:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthDallas-Fort Worth articles

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:CHS Logo.jpg

Image:CHS Logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CHS Logo.jpg

Image:CHS Logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated information by IP

I have reverted edits made by an anonymous IP (170.252.11.11). They put in this paragraph:

"Although some elementary schools in Coppell are rated "Exemplary," several are rated marginally "Acceptable," and the city's high school is ranked "Unacceptable", placing it in the bottom 10% of schools statewide.[1]"

According to the web site that this sentence references, the information is from 2005 and is outdated. The current Texas Education Agency 2007-08 school/district ratings can be found here [2]. According to the TEA, Coppell and Coppell High are currently "recognized." My edits are correct and I don't vandalize pages. --Acntx (talk) 22:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the 2007-2008 Texas Education Agency school/district ratings, which are the most current, can be found using the link above. My claims are not baseless. I am using the data from the Agency that administers the TAKS Test. I don't appreciate being accused of vandalizing pages by an anonymous IP with outdated information from a real estate site. --Acntx (talk) 00:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The following are the current school ratings for Coppell ISD according to the Texas Education Agency. The high school is recognized, not unacceptable, and the district has no "acceptable" campuses. --Acntx (talk) 00:14, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

001 COPPELL H S Recognized

007 P A S S LEARNING CTR Not Rated: Other

042 COPPELL MIDDLE EAST Exemplary

043 COPPELL MIDDLE WEST Recognized

044 COPPELL MIDDLE NORTH Exemplary

101 PINKERTON EL Exemplary

102 LEE EL Exemplary

103 AUSTIN EL Exemplary

105 MOCKINGBIRD EL Exemplary

106 WILSON EL Exemplary

107 LAKESIDE EL Exemplary

108 TOWN CENTER EL Exemplary

109 COTTONWOOD CREEK EL Exemplary

110 VALLEY RANCH EL Exemplary

111 DENTON CREEK EL Exemplary

District map

http://www.coppellisd.com/1516106410118107/lib/1516106410118107/pdfs/map.pdf WhisperToMe (talk) 16:08, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Other docs:

WhisperToMe (talk) 19:47, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coppell Independent School District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090326055622/http://www.ed.gov/programs/nclbbrs/list-1982.pdf to http://www.ed.gov/programs/nclbbrs/list-1982.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coppell Independent School District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151025190535/http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2009/index.html to http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2009/index.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.coppellisd.com/annex

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:54, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]