Talk:Copenhagen–Ringsted Line

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Copenhagen–Ringsted Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927054950/http://www.trm.dk/graphics/Synkron-Library/trafikministeriet/Publikationer/2009/221009/Bane%20%20Aftaletekst%2022%20%20oktober%20ENDELIG%20UDGAVE.pdf to http://www.trm.dk/graphics/Synkron-Library/trafikministeriet/Publikationer/2009/221009/Bane%20%20Aftaletekst%2022%20%20oktober%20ENDELIG%20UDGAVE.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:26, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Old Vestbanen

I cant find the old railway line 'Vestbanen' mentioned in the text. On Google Earth I can only trace an old route going North from Ringsted. Anyway the last time I travelled along the existing railway line the new route joins the existing railway line quite a long way east of Ringsted and remains paralel to the existing railway line to beyond Ringsted. It goes on to the line south. I think we can remove the mention of the old railway line. As for capacity contraints: Trains can also continue to the Airport and Sweden instead of the main Kopenhagen station. The Airport line capacity can be limited to of course. Anyway the hourly non-stop Lyn service between Odense and Hoje Tastruup could easily be diverted, without changing the Kopenhagen main station capacity.Smiley.toerist (talk) 14:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speed limit

When posting speed figures, we should explicitly say whether it is the speed a line was built for, or whether it is certified for that speed. If certification for 250 km/h requires a test run with 275 km/h, which the line can't handle, the 250 km/h will never be reached by actual trains. For now, I am removing claim of the 250 km/h limit since I can't find any sources saying the line is actually certified for that. See also User talk:BIL. --Ysangkok (talk) 00:13, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]