Jump to content

Talk:Alan Cooper (software designer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Cooper (company))

Untitled

[edit]

why is he the "father", not simply the father?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.81.7.13 (talk) 13:44, 20 September 2004 (UTC)[reply]

He's your father. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.32.210 (talk) 15:08, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What's the reference to Xerox parc doing in there? it makes the sentence unreadable gobbledegook. We're talking about design & dev tools not philosophy of UI design. Wiki benguin 08:35, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Wiki_Benguin[reply]

What a nob, its his fauly i'm stuck writing applications that don't work and are slow... :'—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.32.210 (talk) 14:47, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Alan Cooper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}). This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:50, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Alan Cooper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone explain "Inmates" title?

[edit]

I picked up a copy of "Inmates". That is quite a provocative title. As the author points out, engineers are not normal. But who is crazy? It seems to me that the managers are crazy for thinking that they will get better results by delaying the project start and then spending only 3 months on engineering. The engineers are quite sane for ignoring problems they have no control over.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:e000:6306:5000:3617:ebff:fede:435b (talk) 20:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 November 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Frost 12:16, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Alan Cooper is not (or no longer) the primary topic. Alan Cooper (biblical scholar) has 2/3 the page views of the software designer. Throw in all the other Alan Coopers that there are, and the software designer gets a bit more than 50% of the views. Therefore, WP:PTOPIC is not met. Schwede66 02:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66 I think this can be closed as uncontroversial if you do not mind. There is no reason to contest this. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 06:47, 23 November 2024 (UTC) Never mind![reply]
I don’t mind at all. I've moved articles that I thought were even more straightforward and got moaned at big time. Hence the formal process. Schwede66 07:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.