Jump to content

Talk:Construction of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

First feedback: The lead is too short. Make it summarize this article. You might just be able to use the construction section from the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System article as a base and work from there.

Referencing and images look fine so far. No obvious issues with the prose. Will give a full review once the lead is expanded. Jclemens (talk) 03:53, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

Good job.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Thanks for fixing up the lead, looks great now.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Excellent referencing
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    This really is better as a breakout article than as a humongous section of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System article.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Good
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    People have come here to help, but nothing is disputed. Pretty tranquil topic, really.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Great selection of images, in both variety and placement, although I did move one image.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Good job. Your hard work to peel this out and into its own article is appropriately rewarded with promotion to GA status Jclemens (talk) 02:03, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]