Talk:Constitutional Court of Korea

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Constitutional Court of Korea article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Korea Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment

whoever built this page, that person did a fine job. I just wanted to add some more information to this page since i am working for the constitutional court of korea. I still don't know hot to make a full citation. whenever i try to do that, it deletes the last several sections of the article. if anybody knows how to do that, pls help me on this. thanks--Exhinsohn (talk) 07:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constitutional Court of Korea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060728021032/http://www.oefre.unibe.ch/law/icl/ks00000_.html to http://www.oefre.unibe.ch/law/icl/ks00000_.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:20, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File nominated for deletion on commons

The file c:File:Emblem of the Constitutional Court of Korea.svg used in this article has been nominated for deletion on Commons 
Reason: I think time has come to finish the long-forgotten (or ignored) question: Is [Template:M used with invalid code 'tl'. See documentation.]KOGL free?  I doubt its freeness, based on the fact that we do not have definite answer for Template talk:KOGL#Free?. To save your click...  [Template:M used with invalid code 'talkquote'. See documentation.]In case the terms change we (on Wikimedia projects) can still reuse it under the licensing conditions at the time of upload here. But in that case we must stop distributing the file to others because we are not a licensor (only a reuser) and our scope of redistributing entirely relies on the licensing of the source. If the source licensing is not a public license (but a private license contract concluded when the licensee downloads the file from the official source) then it is not free. Its revocable and fails c:Commons:Project scope#Required licensing terms.  We, as of 2018, do not have a final answer for this. And this means, we have to delete these images, including some VIs and FPs. 
Deletion request: link

Message automatically deposited by a robot - -Harideepan (talk) 06:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]

주심 as justice in charge? Media disagrees.

In this Wikipedia article, presumably to distinguish the roles of the two justices, it uses the terms presiding justice (재판장) and justice in charge (주심). I have no idea if the translation of these words has any basis in literature. It seems to me though the media unequivocally disagrees, as the recent impeachment case is gaining more media traction. I have not seen any news outlet translate 주심 as justice in charge – it's consistently translated as presiding justice or presiding judge in every reliable outlet out there. [1][2][3]

This makes sense. 주심 is the justice who presides over the trial! 재판장 is the justice who chairs the trial. So while whoever translated the Korean terms did a fine job, I think a better translation is right there: "presiding justice" for 주심 and "chair" or "chief justice" for 재판장. Motjustescribe (talk) 16:35, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, my bad. They're not trials. They're proceedings and hearings. Motjustescribe (talk) 17:01, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Current event not relevant to the history of the Constitutional Court

@Borgenland - I oppose the inclusion of current events regarding the Constitutional Court in the History section, as it is tangential at best to the formation and development of the court. See WP:VNOT and WP:NOTNEWS. Please justify why it warrants inclusion in this article, particularly in the history section. Motjustescribe (talk) 19:33, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See explanation requested by another user in User talk:Borgenland#Constitutional Court of Korea history. Borgenland (talk) 01:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry it was apparently you. I am standing by it because it remains an unprecedented event in the court’s history and contributed to unexpected events in Korean political history. Borgenland (talk) 01:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While I recognize this as a significant moment in the history of the Constitutional Court, the paragraph felt disconnected from the preceding discussion. I added a lead sentence that contextualizes the event within the broader historical pattern of the Constitutional Court being drawn into political conflicts. I refined the prose for an encyclopedic tone as well. Motjustescribe (talk) 14:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this should be kept. Is it possible that this discussion can be closed, so no unnecessary tags are kept? Synonimany (talk) 21:03, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]