Talk:Computer (occupation)

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

ENIAC vs. Colossus

There is much evidence that the Colossus computer built in England during WW2 predated ENIAC. It's history has been lesser known because it was a rigid state secret, as it was used in code breaking, and Churchill actually ordered it destroyed at the end of the war.71.193.205.212 (talk) 00:10, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And your point is as far as improving the article? Dmcq (talk) 00:20, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematical Tables Project

There should be a section on the Mathematical Tables Project as chronicled in Grier's book. Jfgrcar (talk) 23:58, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Human computer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130414161648/http://www.eniacprogrammers.org/awards.shtml to http://www.eniacprogrammers.org/awards.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moving unsourced material

I'm moving this here until I can verify. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 23:46, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Indian mathematician Radhanath Sikdar was employed as a "computer" for the Great Trigonometrical Survey of India in 1840. It was he who first identified and calculated the height of the world's highest mountain, later called Mount Everest. [citation needed]

Requested move 18 July 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SkyWarrior 03:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Computer (job description) → Computer (occupation) – Strictly speaking the article is about the job itself and not the "job description". Proposed title is in line with other articles, e.g. Mailer (occupation) and Canner (occupation). Rublov (talk) 01:04, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nominator. It's obvious that the article is about the job itself, not its description. JIP | Talk 01:42, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support, much better description. Wayne Jayes (talk) 05:50, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support, it's a sensible move. Schazjmd (talk) 13:54, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support - clearly the correct solution. --Netoholic @ 15:50, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Computer (bureau)

The story I was given long ago in university undergraduate course, by actual professional mathematicians, scientists, or computer scientists, was that the meaning of the term computer had developed, prior to being a mechanical device, to include or to be, not merely a single person performing computation, but an entire team, or the entire office or building in which this was done, ie for computing logarithms etc at pace, such that books of tables could be produced, teams would cooperate, and that buildings with internal mezzanine etc were dedicated to this task, so that (sub-)results could more easily be communicated between teams. Unfortunately, a brief search via internet has not given me means to establish this, in fact it now seems questionable.

Yet it seems entirely likely, even without the illustration of the operation which I have in my mind, that I suppose was shown on overhead projector screen, since it is not in my text books. This was some decades ago, so I am not able to easily find the source.

If anyone can verify, enhance, or disqualify this, please do so either in the article text, or here, as appropriate.

(Please do not under any circumstance publish my IP.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.157.18 (talk) 14:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have given the request in the last sentence of the above message the utter contempt it deserves. Graham87 (talk) 07:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]