Talk:Computable ordinal

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Numbers

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumbersWikipedia:WikiProject NumbersTemplate:WikiProject NumbersNumbers articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Recursive set

What does it mean for the well-ordering to be recursive? Is it just the same as the underlying set being recursive while also having a well-order? ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 21:45, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me it's meant for the order relation to be a recursive subset of $S^{2}$ , where $S$ is the subset of the naturals. ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 21:49, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. A well-ordering is recursive if and only if the underlying set S is a recursive subset of the natural numbers and the ordering relation on S is a recursive subset of S×S. For purposes of deciding the latter issue, one can either ask if the binary indicator function is recursive or the subset of the natural numbers obtained from the ordering by applying the Cantor pairing function has a (unary) indicator function which is recursive. The result is the same either way. JRSpriggs (talk) 05:23, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. Appreciate it! ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 09:25, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]