Talk:Committee of the whole

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Parliamentary Procedure, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Parliamentary ProcedureWikipedia:WikiProject Parliamentary ProcedureTemplate:WikiProject Parliamentary ProcedureParliamentary Procedure articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Hey, this article shouldn't be a redirect - it ought to cover Committees of the Whole generally, and their role in parlamentary procedure. --BenMcLean 19:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like a more detailed explanation of why an assembly would use a committee of the whole. What can be done or cannot be done in such a committee that makes it different than a full assembly? I see from the article that it differs in each assembly, but the first paragraph should answer these questions in a general sense. Scott Trimble (talk) 01:35, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 03:31, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Committee of the Whole → Committee of the whole – Per WP:NCCAPS, only proper nouns should be capitalized. As this article covers committees of the whole generally, and not a specific body, it should be treated as a common noun. Ibadibam (talk) 20:33, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I checked Google Books to see what reliable sources do. Robert's Rules of Order uses a small "w"[1] and that's the ultimate reliable source. However, most of the book references I found use a capital W. [2] [3]. I think I will side with Robert's and support this move. --MelanieN (talk) 23:28, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.