Talk:Commissioning of the Twelve Apostles

Bible Top‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Jesus Top‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Jesus work group, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move to Commissioning of the Twelve Apostles. Cúchullain ^t/c 20:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commissioning the twelve apostles → Commissioning the Twelve Apostles – I don't actually have a strong opinion on this either way, but the use of capitalization in the title of this article currently doesn't match the opening sentence. I considered changing the sentence myself, but since I'm not a biblical scholar or even a Christian I figured establishing a consensus one way or the other was the best way. elvenscout742 (talk) 04:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the title is already counter usual MOS/Title practice grammatically in using the active verbal noun "Doing" - It should have "of" to nominalize "commissioning." it should be Commissioning of the twelve apostles, but as for caps, since "the" already makes it definite, technically there is no need for caps, search a full string such as "the twelve apostles were" and in a normal sentence Twelve Apostles aren't capitalized in modern books. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:48, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, MOS/Title doesn't really mean anything if the majority of biblical scholar call it by this term. I really don't know if they do, of course. elvenscout742 (talk) 06:58, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see that any would - the absence of "of" limits the action to the 1 minute "The act of commissioning" it took to say the words, rather than the whole series of intent, action and consequences. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:52, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to Commissioning of the Twelve Apostles. The article on the Twelve Apostles is at Twelve Apostles, showing we generally categorize the term (otherwise it would be Twelve apostles). John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:32, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I'd be happy with this. The thing is that in a run of text "the role of the twelve apostles.." we wouldn't see capitalization, but as an article title this isn't just any twelve apostles. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support move to Commissioning of the Twelve Apostles as counter-proposed, or alternatively to Commissioning the Twelve Apostles as originally proposed but prefer the counter proposal. And IMO the lead should read "The commissioning of the Twelve Apostles is...". Andrewa (talk) 19:27, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Biblr

Cute voice 104.255.233.89 (talk) 10:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]