Jump to content

Talk:Commander, Submarine Force Atlantic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Which is it?

[edit]

Is it "ComSubLant" or "COMSUBLANT". The title shows it one way and the article body shows it another, without explanation. — QuicksilverT @ 02:04, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Navy sources seem to consistently use COMSUBLANT. I think it should be moved to that title. Ditto ComSubPac. 72.200.151.13 (talk) 18:00, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 September 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. No opposition to the proposed title, but no prejudice against a future RM discussing whether the title should be given in full as a few people were OK with. Jenks24 (talk) 13:19, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



ComSubLantCOMSUBLANT – Official capitalization, which is already in primary use throughout the article. – 72.200.151.13 (talk) 04:50, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@72.200.151.13: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:03, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. It is. COMmander, SUBmarine Force AtLANTic 72.200.151.13 (talk) 05:47, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Having said that the ComSubPac,COMSUBPAC related ngrams seem to swing the other way. GregKaye 06:55, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think having two different ways of capitalizing the titles is unacceptable, and I believe we should go with the official capitalization for the article names.
http://www.csp.navy.mil/
http://www.public.navy.mil/subfor/hq/Pages/ReportingAboard.aspx 72.200.151.13 (talk) 03:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on COMSUBLANT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:39, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]