Talk:Come & Get It (Selena Gomez song)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Come & Get It (Selena Gomez song) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Selena Gomez (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Selena Gomez, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Selena GomezWikipedia:WikiProject Selena GomezTemplate:WikiProject Selena GomezSelena Gomez articles

Release History

Is it possible for the release date for the United Kingdom to be left alone. The single has not been released Worldwide as of yet, as it is only available for pre-order in the UK where the release date (according to iTunes and Amazon MP3) is 26th July 2013.

See:
iTunes release date

Amazon MP3 release date

Tracklist

Digital Single

"Come & Get It" - 3:51

Remixes

"Come & Get It" (Jump Smokers Club Remix) - 4:13
"Come & Get It" (Robert DeLong Club Remix) - 4:36
"Come & Get It" (Cahill Club Remix) - 7:05
"Come & Get It" (Fred Falke Club Remix) - 8:35
"Come & Get It" (DJ M3 Club Remix) - 5:31
"Come & Get It" (Dave Aude Club Remix) - 6:11

Check this website for remixes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/come-get-it-remixes/id649171906

Video

The video seems quite similar to Rihanna's "Where Have You Been" - which is one that Mandler did not do. Have any of the reviewers commented on that similarity ? (So that we can mention it in the article. -- Beardo (talk) 18:11, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was not moved. --BDD (talk) 06:19, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Come & Get It (song) → Come & Get It – This is the only song on the disambiguation list to be spelled using the ampersand, on top of the fact that the song by Krewella doesn't have an article. WikiRedactor (talk) 21:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - ampersand vs. "and" is insufficient disambiguation, purely an orthographic issue, particularly for songs. See already Dailymail.co.uk Come and get it: Selena Gomez started off a star-studded night of performances with a song and dance to her latest single at the 2013 Billboard Music Awards in Las Vegas, Nevada on Sunday - The young singer performed her latest single Come and Get It, a dance track off her upcoming album by the same name..

Secondly per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC we have no such concept as "primary song" so per W:DAB rename should be to disambiguous disambiguation:

Come & Get It (song) → Come & Get It (Selena Gomez song)

Come and Get It (song) → Come and Get It (Paul McCartney song)

then Come & Get It (song) redirects both repoint to → Come and Get It disambiguation page

In ictu oculi (talk) 02:03, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose WP:RECENTISM, and "&" is frequently used to substitute for "and"; also per MOS:TM the title of this article should use "and" and not "&" so should be called Come and Get It (Selena Gomez song) and the current title redirected to the disambiguation page, since there's several other songs by that name. The difference between "and", "+" , "&" is purely stylistic and is insufficiently disambiguatory, considering how many people shorten things by using & instead of 'and'. The Paul McCartney song should also be renamed to include "Paul McCartney" per WP:NCM -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 05:04, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MOSTM is about trademarks not every article with a sign, read WP:& for more information. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:50, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Song titles are the same as movie titles, such as given in page "Alien3". This is a single, therefore a product, therefore falls under WP:TM for the title. -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 06:50, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

False, this is not "C0M3 & G37 17", is it? As apparently is difficult to you to read WP:&, it goes like this: "Retain ampersands in titles of works or organizations". Nothing to discuss, excepting you don't want to understand Wikipedia guidelines. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 18:55, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where did I dispute your WP:&? If you had read my response to your response, you see that I dispute your characterization that MOS:TM would not apply, not that your finding of WP:& would not apply. -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 04:05, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, my bad, sorry. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:33, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose any kind of move, at least for now. Come and Get It (song) should have its own RM. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:33, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Certifications

The song have been certified on Australia, Denmark and New Zealand, you can check it on wiki es. --AleeDear (talk) 22:55, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not in Australia, the source not say this. JLuckas12 (talk) 01:26, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Video location mentioned in the article could be wrong

According to the article, the field of flowers in the video is in Texas because the flowers are called Texas bluebonnets (Lupinus texensis, which are endemic to Texas). However, no source is provided, and I cannot find a reliable source to support that claim. Therefore, should this be included in the article? Besides, some sources indicate that this field is in the Tejon Ranch, in California. There is a very similar flower to Lupinus texensis there, called Lupinus benthamii (Spider Lupines).

Keep in mind that the color of the flowers in the video has undergone post-production. This is proven by several pictures taken of Selena during the making of the video. This picture of Selena seems to come from a reliable source, indicating that the field is in the Tejon Ranch in Tejon, California:

https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/O9dzD1Z7rGudxa72pvjvJUFi0NwMaY-yk8vy9KsN0QE?full-exif=true

Notice that the color is not intensely blue before post-production of the video. Also, look at these additional pictures from a part of the Tejon Ranch and compare them with the previous picture:

http://iheartscv.blogspot.com/2010/03/happenings-wildflowers-by-millions-part.html

I'm not saying that we must say the field is in the Tejon Ranch in California (I'll let you decide if the source I provided is reliable or not), but I AM saying that unless you can provide a reliable source to support the Texas bluebonnets claim, it should be taken out. Dontreader (talk) 09:46, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Genre note

I have removed "worldbeat" because its source, About.com, has been declared unreliable at WP:RSN. Restore if a more reliable source can be used inplace. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 01:27, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bhangra should be replaced with Bollywood. There are no identifiable bhangra elements. Whereas the Indian vocals and tabla beats are closely identified with Bollywood. Insysion (talk) 13:30, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Come & Get It (Selena Gomez song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:36, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Come & Get It (Selena Gomez song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130801101307/http://www.pluggedin.com/music/tracks/2013/selena-gomez-come-and-get-it.aspx to http://www.pluggedin.com/music/tracks/2013/selena-gomez-come-and-get-it.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Come & Get It (Selena Gomez song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]