Jump to content

Talk:Cologarithm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article does not specify whether a cologarithm is the natural logarithm or the common logarithm. Could someone whom knows which please add more details? Jecowa 05:58, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would be the same either way, but the addition of this is another example of wiki creations gone too far. We may as well give a special name to sqrt(1/x), sin(1/x), and e^(1/x). The 'creation' of a name found in a textbook dating back to the early 1900's is not needed, and only serves to further clutter an increasingly cluttered wiki. Imagine what will happen to wikipedia (and it is already happening) if one needs only to define a term in a paper somewhere in order for it to become 'official'. I define the Xylog base b of a complex number c to be the sum of the base b logarithms of the real part and the square of the imaginary part. Now, let's create a wiki on it and add it to merriam webster. Geez. 174.228.1.99 (talk) 06:49, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cologarithm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]