Talk:College of Europe

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Belgium

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Poland

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Masters' degree

I know some who attended the College of Europe in the early 80s, who did not get a Master's degree (and did not have the option). When was the Master's degree created?

I know French students at ENA do traditionally not get a degree (just a job if they are good enough). Brigittemoew (talk) 06:48, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helle-Thorning-Schmidt.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Helle-Thorning-Schmidt.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:56, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on College of Europe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090207013354/http://old.fdv.uni-lj.si/osebne/Debeljak.htm to http://old.fdv.uni-lj.si/osebne/Debeljak.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on College of Europe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This reads like an advert for the college

This page reads like it was created by the college's marketing department and definitely doesn't seem to be objective. 114.23.234.192 (talk) 01:42, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality dispute

It seems that there is near-edit warring occurring on this article, between those who believe the scandals should be covered, and those who feel it is not representative. Either way, there is a disagreement on the neutrality of the article. Instead of warring back and forth, could there please be a discussion so either side can understand where the other is coming from, and to make it clear if one side is purposefully editing in a biased manner (either in defense of their employer/alma mater, or in attack of the institution for biased personal/ideological reasons). It is common practice for scandals to be mentioned on Wikipedia with direct reference to the parties involved,^[1]^[2] hence it has been left with the information as is for now. I don't want to be involved, so it would be good if both sides here could come to a resolution. [any advice, admins?] Shadowssettle_(talk) 14:47, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn't realise you were an admin, User:Yamla, any thoughts? Shadowssettle_(talk) 14:55, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I take no position on either side, except to note that one side has involved someone working for the college, removing the scandal. That is a clear violation of WP:COI and that's why I've been reverting their edits. I want to be incredibly clear, though, it may still be the case that this information should be removed. It's just, it shouldn't be removed by someone with a conflict of interest. --Yamla (talk) 14:57, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I am the person who published this part of the article. it is based on press reports and from the website of the European Parliament. There are independent publications. The removal of this content was not motivated with a source (For now, there aren't a judiciary decision that the articles published in EUobserver, LeVif/L'Express, and Inside Arabia Online are defamatory. Also, motions taken by MEPs of the European Parliament are published in the public domain.

NEWyork2001 (talk) 16:14, 11 April 2019 (UTC)NEWyork2001NEWyork2001 (talk) 16:14, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't controversies in Wikipedia normally put at the bottom of an article? Currently it reads a bit weird to have the section placed between "Campuses" and "Academics". In terms of structure, it does not make much sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TalonShadow (talk • contribs) 05:58, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm not sure where you came to that conclusion (I've seen them about everywhere), but I take your point about placement Shadowssettle_(talk) 10:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

[1] "2019 college admissions bribery scandal".

[2] "Accusations of bullying at Imperial College London".

[1]

[2]