Talk:Collapse of Cần Thơ Bridge

Vietnam Low‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

coordinates

can someone edit the article with coordinates? riffic 12:16, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article title

May I suggest moving the page to 2007 Collapse of Can Tho Bridge, since this seems more in line with current event/natural disaster naming conventions? (And also avoids having one prepositional phrase after another.) To all who have worked on the article, by the way, great job :D Gracenotes^T § 00:28, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, Collapse of the Can Tho Bridge seems like an appropriate title as well, although starting with the date is not a bad idea. Gracenotes^T § 00:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Make it "2007 Collapse of Can Tho Bridge" Mapletip 02:19, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who has worked on a few disaster articles, I feel that the current title (Collapse of the Can Tho Bridge) is probably fine; in this case we do not need the year as we have a very specific event alread merely with the name of the bridge, which is, after all, unique. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 06:43, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

can someone update the cause?

it states on the article page: Early hypotheses suggest that quick removal of scaffold (2 days) may have been the cause of the accident.[4]

what the hell does (2 days) mean? it's not clear at all, and for someone reading it, they might not understand - like what i've just done. i really do wish that when people update this site, they re-read what they've written to make sure it actually makes sense - 2 days means absolutely nothing in this sentence.

unfortunately don't speak the language to update it myself, from the reference (can't figure which reference it is, as ref 4 doesn't have a link) 194.221.133.226 10:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would presume that it means the scaffolding was removed in 2 days which is considered too quick Nil Einne 14:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Collapse of Cần Thơ Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]