Talk:Colias alfacariensis
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 8 April 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by page mover) Simplexity22 (talk) 00:31, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Colias sareptensis → Colias alfacariensis – Principle of least surprise. The name sareptensis, albeit older than alfacariensis, is widely regarded as invalid. Virtually every source I can find calls this species Colias alfacariensis. LamBoet (talk) 21:40, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Pinging User:Plantdrew. (I know this isn't a botanical question, but Plantdrew is very good on these sorts of issues.) Dekimasuよ! 11:03, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support This is a slam dunk taxonomically. The ICZN ruled in 2007 to preserve alfacariensis against sareptensis (abstract[1]). Full text PDF of the 2006 proposal to conserve [2]. Plantdrew (talk) 20:56, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.