Talk:Cogobuy

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 March 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"DGG" believed this to be a neutral point of view The Banner talk has a personal connection to this company going back over a year, request a third opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmyCarter87 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Funny that you accuse me of having a personal connection with this company while on your talk page somebody else is mentions you as paid editor. And your accusation of cyberbullying the article is funny. The Banner talk 23:15, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ow, the article is just 7 months old and written by the company "Senior Management Consultant". If I have something with the article, that will be a severe allergy for promo and advertising. The Banner talk 23:28, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed request for impartial review AmyCarter87 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless The Banner talk clearly has a personal connection and cannot be impartial.

Full disclosure I was not paid to edit the Cogobuy page and have no relationship to the company, The Banner talk and a personal friend of mine got into a nasty argument on Wikipedia and asked me to rewrite the article in a neutral point of view. All my research comes from the Internet and is well sourced, I was not provided with any information from the company. AmyCarter87 (talk • contribs

Advertising

I have added an advertising tag. To my the article is advertising due to the adding of about every detail, relevant or non-relevant. The Banner talk 08:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that a lot of the earlier content was not concise and talked about non-relevant details. I reworded the section about E-Commerce Platform to reflect the fact it quickly grew to become one of the largest mediums for electronic component distribution in China, as opposed to being promotional material about a service offering. I had removed the advertising tag before seeing this discussion, however still think the edit resolved the issues flagged. Happy to discuss further. Redwards21 (talk) 05:35, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:51, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]