Talk:Cockiness (Love It)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cockiness (Love It) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cockiness (Love It) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 29, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 16, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that according to one critic, Rihanna appeared to be "channelling" Swedish singer-songwriter and rapper Neneh Cherry on "Cockiness (Love It)" in a "pseudo-melodic" impersonation?

Caribbean: Barbados Low‑importance

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Barbados (assessed as Low-importance).

Reggae Low‑importance

	This article is part of the Reggae WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the coverage of articles relating to ska and reggae. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.ReggaeWikipedia:WikiProject ReggaeTemplate:WikiProject ReggaeReggae
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rihanna Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rihanna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rihanna on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RihannaWikipedia:WikiProject RihannaTemplate:WikiProject RihannaRihanna
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

DYK nomination

Genre

Are we going to decide on a genre?--Jakeriederer (talk) 01:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No. Critics have not specifically said a genre. Calvin • ^{Watch n' Learn} 10:14, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Background section

I totally support the IP address that removed the background. It is useless in the article cause it even not mentiones "Cockiness". — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 21:53, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

This song has no notability, except that its sung by Rihanna. It charted within the lower half of US and UK charts, and its reviews are taken from the album's reviews so they can be included on that page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.79.94.225 (talk) 23:16, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It passes notability. Calvin • ^{Watch n' Learn} 02:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~No it doesn't. How does it pass WP:GNG with 10 secondary sources and 8 KB? This is better off merged with Talk That Talk. Sorry.~~ —WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 02:59, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where else do you think reviews will come from?? Album reviews for songs are perfectly acceptable and it has charted on multiple charts. Calvin • ^{Watch n' Learn} 03:49, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks a lot better now. —WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 04:25, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When a song has gained position in mainstream music charts, it is considered notable per WP:NSONGS. Therefore this song deserves its own article. Yours faithfully, Kotak kasut. 03:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For expansion

Calvin • ^{Watch n' Learn} 05:23, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. I have never seen most of this sources being used on Wikipedia. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 07:02, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you have already added the links. Lol. You are fast. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 07:16, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sampling

Hey guys, I want to ask a question regarding this song. It contains samples from Greg Kinnear's performance of "Summertime" in the 2003 film "Stuck On You" right? If yes, should the statement be included in the article? I'm asking this out of curiousity, please don't be harsh *gulps*. Thanks! Yours faithfully, Kotak kasut. 12:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is any mention of a sample in the booklet? By law you have to state it if you have sampled a song. Aaron • ^{You Da One} 12:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the answer Calvin! Yours faithfully, Kotak kasut. 12:50, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay. Aaron • ^{You Da One} 12:52, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Location of the recording

Hello,

The Place where the song is recorded, it's strange. It's really write on the liner note Sofitel Paris Le Faubourg, Room 538 ?

Tk You Mikani (talk) 17:00, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Aaron • ^{You Da One} 21:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Calvin, it's funny. Mikani (talk) 08:34, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cockiness (Love It)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 00:17, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will be taking this review. As this is my fourth or fifth review for this nominator, he should know what to expect. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:17, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
	1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	~~See below~~ Good
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Good
	2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Good
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	~~See below~~ Good
	2c. it contains no original research.	Good
	3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Good enough for me
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Good
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Fine
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Per definition
	6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Good
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Good
	7. Overall assessment.	Pending

Comments

1a
Lede

Why is Mr. Bangladesh linked two times in the same sentence? Also, how are we supposed to refer to him? Is Mr. used every time in reliable sources, or do they shorten to Bangladesh?
His production name is Mr. Bangladesh, regardless of how critics refer to him. Unlinked Crawford. Aaron • ^{You Da One}
I'd suggest splitting the lede into two paragraphs, one for production and one for the song and reception.
Done. Aaron • ^{You Da One}

Background and conception

Once again, why is Mr. Bangladesh linked twice?
Unlinked Crawford. Aaron • ^{You Da One}

2b

What makes DJ Booth a reliable source? Cultureblues?
DJ Booth is perfectly reliable for GA. The critic, Nathan, has a BA in Journalism and Creative Writing. DJ Booth is not reliable for FA, which this article will not become. Aaron • ^{You Da One}

I don't get how something can be reliable enough for GA but not reliable enough for FA. Regarding the credentials, I have a BA in Indonesian lit, but that doesn't automatically make me a reliable critic for works such as Sitti Nurbaya. I tried looking at RSN, but there was nothing on DJ Booth. Also, what about Cultureblues? Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:59, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Booth is used in other GAs, it's acceptable. I know, I don't understand how something can be reliable for GA and not FA, but that's FAC for you! I'm pretty sure Culture Blues is reliable. Aaron • ^{You Da One} 01:02, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked at RSN. I will add a question about Culture Blues. Of course, for this to pass immediately we could just remove the reviews until the RSN thread is finished. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not worried about it passing at this very moment in time lol. I don't mind waiting. Aaron • ^{You Da One}

Alright, hopefully they don't... well, I've had bad experiences with RSN. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:21, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback was that DJ Booth is okay for a review but cultureblues should probably not be used. (here) Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:05, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removed CultureBlues. Aaron • ^{You Da One} 23:21, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not much this time around. Just a couple fixes and we should be good to go

Thanks ~~

Paraphrasing checks fine. Spotchecks on three sources above also fine. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:56, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And that's a wrap. Congrats! Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:05, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Aaron • ^{You Da One} 00:17, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone have access to Billboard.biz?

To see if the song charted on the Bubbling Under R&B/Hip Hop chart? Aaron • ^{You Da One} 17:15, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Live performances

Rihanna performed Cockiness (Love It) for the first time at Radio 1's Big Weekend on June 24, 2012. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.79.31.55 (talk) 17:49, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional Single

Being that a new lead single is going to be released simultaneously, and there are clearly no radio adds, I see this as a promotional single rather than a single itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MichaelB722 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is still available for digital download on iTunes, making the song a single. Never mind that new single is coming, this is still single too. — Tomica (talk) 16:37, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is a promo single, the only reason this was released was so that fans could get a studio version of what was performed at the MTV VMAs--CiaraGotMeGood (talk) 03:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paid digital download release is not a promo single. It's an actual single. AARON• ^TALK 17:15, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then Wait Your Turn and Beyonce's song Party should be "actual singles" too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.195.219.61 (talk) 07:48, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Wait Your Turn" is already a single, and I tried to make "Party" single, but one user keeps reverting it to just song. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 09:11, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cockiness (Love It). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]