Talk:Climate of Bismarck, North Dakota

United States: North Dakota Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Dakota portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Dakota (assessed as Mid-importance).

Weather: Climate Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Climate task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Fahrenheit or Celsius?

Because this article deals with a location within the United States, Fahrenheit and inches should be listed first, unless this is standard procedure on WikiProject North Dakota. Feel free to contact me about this issue at my talk page. I'm going to change it back later tomorrow, unless a discussion takes place to indicate otherwise. Thanks, RyanG e rbil10 04:56, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you, Ryan. --Matth e wUND^(talk) 06:47, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would tend to disagree; both of the units are there, but we're writing an international encyclopedia here, and the most broadly used system of measurement should be presented first. --AlexWCovington (talk) 08:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you check almost any other U.S. city's article on here, Fahrenheit practically always appears before Celsius. I don't see why the Bismarck article would be treated any differently. --Matth e wUND^(talk) 08:28, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The manual of style states that in cases such as this, source units should be placed first, and in this case it's the US vestigial system. I have to express my disappointment. --AlexWCovington (talk) 08:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any article to insignificant to be included in this encyclopedia?

I simply cannot believe that anyone created a separate article for the climate of Bismarck. 68.218.170.137 20:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Climate Data

Data should come from official or academic sources. Weather.com and wunderground.com are not original data sources and their use should be discouraged. Use the National Climactic Data Center instead. --AlexWCovington (talk) 00:21, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Climate of Bismarck, North Dakota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061209072346/http://www.kfyrtv.com/KevinsCorner.asp to http://kfyrtv.com/KevinsCorner.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]