Talk:Classical Cepheid variable
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Light curve characteristics
[edit]It would be nice to explain what sets Cepheids apart from other variable stars. I have read (in Modern Theories of the Universe from Herschel to Hubble) that what characterises a Cepheid is its light curve, with a relatively sharp and a slower decline. Can someone elaborate more? CielProfond (talk) 01:15, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
The obvious missing column in the table
[edit]... is the Luminosity. Distance and/or absolute magnitude would also be nice. With the table as it stands, the classic relationship that makes these stars important is not evident. -- Elphion (talk) 20:42, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
- Great idea - want to add a column? If not I will do it sometime in the next few weeks. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:30, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- I tried looking for the data, found what looked like conflicting stories. If you can point me to a good source I can try to do the honors. Otherwise happy to let you do the heavy lifting. -- Elphion (talk) 01:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- If you d o a column I will have a look a bit later. It will be a matter of looking up articles. I'd do luminosity rather than abs mag as the latter seems to be falling out of favour a bit from what I can tell.... Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:14, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- I tried looking for the data, found what looked like conflicting stories. If you can point me to a good source I can try to do the honors. Otherwise happy to let you do the heavy lifting. -- Elphion (talk) 01:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Classical Cepheid variable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101009205927/http://www.institute-of-brilliant-failures.com/ to http://www.institute-of-brilliant-failures.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:24, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Physical sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
- C-Class Astronomy articles
- High-importance Astronomy articles
- C-Class Astronomy articles of High-importance
- C-Class Astronomical objects articles
- Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)