Jump to content

Talk:Citizen Weather Observer Program

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Better picture and caption?

[edit]

The picture of the home WX station makes it difficult to see the various sensors and apparatus. At first glance, a tall mast is seen with anemometer atop. Other than that, cars, homes and clutter, hiding other (significant) apparatus. Can we find or take a better picture?

Additionally, the caption for the picture reads, "A CWOP home weather station." Seems too specific, as a "Home weather station" need not be a CWOP member/contributor, or "station"...and that station is much like any other home station. To most people, that's just a weather station. :-) spelunkster (talk) 21:26, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First, regarding the actual photo: It meets the siting standards, anemometer as high as possible (ideally 10 meters) with other instruments at the 4-5 foot level. A closer view would lose some sensors unless it was looking straight up from the ground. That might be better; I can look into that, though different manufacturers will look different.
Second, regarding the caption: CWOP stations are private stations, generally located on private personal property (i.e., at a home, as shown), which, while possibly comsisting of a variety of technologies, are (supposed) to meet certain siting standards, and which provide the observed data to the national CWOP network. That *IS* what the photo shows. Some home weather stations don't meet the standards and while they might be in CWOP, perhaps shouldn't be; other weather stations are not CWOP stations. Since there is a separate article on automatic weather stations, there is no need for a more general description of the photo.
Third, the CWOP elements are visible in the photo. Any other components are not CWOP. How do I know this? Well, its mine. Famartin (talk) 21:35, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In many regards, you're preaching to the choir. You see, there are myriad of apparatus that makes an AWS, an actual CWOP station. Such as the APRS(-IS) medium, bridge devices/software, 2-meter rig, DigiPeater, etc. I don't see any of that in the photo (which would be difficult to depict anyway), and my point is that it looks to the normal observer (no pun intended), like an AWS rather than a CWOP station. Without APRS and the components that support it, there *is* no CWOP. How do I know this? Well, I'm a ham radio operator who has contributed WX data to the APRS network, well before APRS-IS made it easy for the non-hams, And no one is questioning your siting ;-) In fact, I applaud yours. Maybe a disclaimer in the caption is in order? E.g."APRS(-IS) apparatus not shown." spelunkster (talk) 19:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Citizen Weather Observer Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Citizen Weather Observer Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update needed re: FindU server services

[edit]

From emails from Steve Dimse: "Findu is end of life. Sometime this week NOAA will begin taking the feed of CWOP stations directly, bypassing findU…. There is only a single findU server at this point and it is very brittle, rebooting itself and dying regularly. I do not have the time or energy's to keep it up. I will restart it when someone notifies me of a problem …, but at some point something will die beyond repair, and it will go away." "APRS.fi has the data, and some weather display methods, and the data is available from MADIS though only raw data and not easily." 50.47.151.13 (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]