Jump to content

Talk:Circle time

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Advertising Puff?

[edit]

This page appears to be an advertising puff for Jenny Mosley's branded "Quality Circle Time" and she appears to have written much of the evidence in support of her private commercial product˜˜˜˜ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Artaxerxesdaking (talkcontribs) 18:19, November 26, 2007

You're right -- it certainly seems like puff to me. I'm not sure what the best solution is, though I've certainly seen the term used outside of this product being described. I'll see what I can do about it... Agent0042 (talk) 03:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been copied by other websites

[edit]

Content from this page has been copied without attribution: [1][2] (archive 17 June 2006 [3]). This is a violation of Wikipedia's licensing, but it's also important to be aware of it to avoid a backwards copyright violation deletion. It's other sites that are violating Wikipedia; there's no obvious evidence that this page was copied and pasted from other sites. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:05, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Circle time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:33, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]