Talk:Circle time

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Circle time article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 November 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by Erpert (talk · contribs) on 12 November 2018 with the comment:
Article reads like a non-notable essay (and I didn't notify the creator because s/he hasn't been on Wikipedia since 2014).
It was contested by Andrew Davidson (talk · contribs) on 2018-11-13 with the comment:
The topic is notable and there's no valid reason for deletion.

Education High‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Start‑class Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Advertising Puff?

This page appears to be an advertising puff for Jenny Mosley's branded "Quality Circle Time" and she appears to have written much of the evidence in support of her private commercial product˜˜˜˜ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Artaxerxesdaking (talk • contribs) 18:19, November 26, 2007

You're right -- it certainly seems like puff to me. I'm not sure what the best solution is, though I've certainly seen the term used outside of this product being described. I'll see what I can do about it... Agent0042 (talk) 03:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been copied by other websites

Content from this page has been copied without attribution: [1][2] (archive 17 June 2006 [3]). This is a violation of Wikipedia's licensing, but it's also important to be aware of it to avoid a backwards copyright violation deletion. It's other sites that are violating Wikipedia; there's no obvious evidence that this page was copied and pasted from other sites. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:05, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Circle time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060909055740/http://csauth.ccny.cuny.edu/current/cwe/Circle-Time-Newsletter.cfm to http://csauth.ccny.cuny.edu/current/cwe/Circle-Time-Newsletter.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:33, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]