Talk:Church of Christ Pantocrator, Nesebar/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bencherlite^Talk 21:56, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Review

Preliminaries: no dab links, no broken external links.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I made a few minor alterations and delinked a few common words, but otherwise it's good enough for GA

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Offline and Bulgarian-language sources accepted in good faith (I ran one through Google Translate and got the gist at least!)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   It would be nice to know when the church stopped being used as a church and when it started to become an art gallery, but not essential for GA status

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Personally, I wouldn't have all three images in the lead section as it were, but would have at least one in one or more of the lower sections to space them out a bit.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Good work. Well done. Bencherlite^Talk 22:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)