Jump to content

Talk:Church of Christ Pantocrator, Nesebar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleChurch of Christ Pantocrator, Nesebar has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 27, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 29, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the exterior decoration of the medieval Church of Christ Pantocrator in Nesebar on the Bulgarian coast prominently features swastikas?

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Church of Christ Pantocrator, Nesebar/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BencherliteTalk 21:56, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Review

[edit]

Preliminaries: no dab links, no broken external links.

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    I made a few minor alterations and delinked a few common words, but otherwise it's good enough for GA
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Offline and Bulgarian-language sources accepted in good faith (I ran one through Google Translate and got the gist at least!)
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    It would be nice to know when the church stopped being used as a church and when it started to become an art gallery, but not essential for GA status
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Personally, I wouldn't have all three images in the lead section as it were, but would have at least one in one or more of the lower sections to space them out a bit.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Good work. Well done. BencherliteTalk 22:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]