Talk:Chrono Resurrection

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Chrono Resurrection/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

• Woah, the first sentence is a mouthfull... can you split it up? Y
• "The team included up to nine members, most of which having about two-and-a-half years of experiences in the industry." --> "...most of which had about..."? Y
• Don't need to list the scenes that would be featured... borders on game guide content. Y
• "Due to time constraints, the development team expected that Robo and Ayla would have 50% chances of not being featured." - what makes these characters special or worthy of extra note compared to the other characters that could be featured? Y
• "The team tried to capture the feel of the original game with updated graphics and sounds.[6] The artists and animators faced difficulty in reproducing the characters due to the differences of style between the original game's sprites, artwork and PlayStation version anime sequences" - stops talking about characters, then mentions them again in the next sentence. Flow could be improved. Y
• "letter to Resurrection Games before it" --> "...before that date"? Y

There aren't many issues; it's generally a good and interesting read. Please leave me a note when you're done with this. Cheers, —Giggy 15:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

I believe I have fixed all of the issues. However, if the original nominator had something different in mind when I removed some content, apologies and feel free to add it back. I am in no way an expert on this topic. That being said I think the article looks GA quality now. Artichoker^[talk] 15:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

I think you did well, thanks. I added back the info about Robo and Ayla, because the original game had only seven playable characters and so I think it's worth mentioning that they were all to appear in the demo except two. I did reword the sentence though since it wasn't clear how many characters there were. Kariteh (talk) 17:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Untitled

Cool, all looks good, passing. —Giggy 03:48, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

This GAN has passed, and this is now a good article! If you found this review helpful, please consider helping out a fellow editor by reviewing another good article nomination. Help and advice on how to do so is available at Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles, and you can ask for the help of a GAN mentor, if you wish.

Cheers, —Giggy 03:48, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chrono Resurrection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060507142747/http://www.opcoder.com/projects/chrono/ to http://www.opcoder.com/projects/chrono/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:02, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Is this really notable enough for a wikipedia article? 68.118.98.100 (talk) 16:38, 15 August 2023 (UTC)